User talk:AMbroodEY

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive 1 from 24th August 2005 to 9th March 2006
Archive 2 from 14th March 2005 to 4th December 2006

Hi i'm not as active as I used to be...

अमेय आर्यन DaBrood© 16:10, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Indian Buddhist Revival

Before doing drastic and big changes please participate in RFC discussion. RFC is not removed from the article. Pkulkarni 18:18, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dalit "Protests"

Perhaps... but the wikipolice pak are also pretty obsessed with Political Correctedness... Hkelkar 20:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Hindu dalits should convert to Buddhism. Even though they are Hindus they do not have any justice. Violence is not a solution but sometimes it is necessary especially against Barbaric Hindus.Hindu Mobs are killing innocent Buddhist in a barbaric way. It is difficult to understand why these minority Buddhists are not taking our example? Shrilankabuddhist 15:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Hindushudra

Hi Amey, what to do about this guy ? --NRS | T/M\B 17:44, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello, why are you reverting changes? Please read our Hindu literature before attacking Hindu Articles Hindushudra 17:58, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

He is wreaking havoc everywhere. He moved the Hindu page to Hindu-Shudra. I moved it back. But he is still on his shudrization spree. --NRS | T/M\B 18:03, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

To understand why I removed to the right title please read Varnas Dharma. If you don't understand our Hinduism then study well Hindushudra 18:09, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
do a check user on him.--D-Boy 07:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
In my college I am suferring too much because of these few guys. They tease me even in front of other euorpean people. Thanks for blocking all these Shudra users. Their one point agenda is defame Hinduism and nothing else. Holybrahmin 16:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copied from [W:INB]

AMbroodEY, you are entirely correct. Furthermore, I would like to humbly apologize for my awful and outrageous remarks. Anyone who has read this simply must know that I am deeply ashamed at the numerous wrongs I committed with the posts I made. There are so many, I can't even begin.
I trolled, basically. I didn't intend to, but I did. I've ruined the talk page of a wonderful project in the most foul, grotesque way. Even if my posts were forever deleted (which they can't be, I know), the hurt I may have caused so many excellent editors and people who come across these pages is almost unbearable to me.
Please find it in your heart to forgive me. I am here to learn and help you in whatever way I can. NinaEliza 22:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Furthermore, AMbroodEY, I would like to personally apologise to you. I assumed bad faith last night and what I did was simply outrageous. My non-response to you was simple laziness and procrastination. You've done and said nothing to me to warrant my suspicion of you. I hope you we can put this behind us and work together (as our time allows) in the future.
Sincerely,
NinaEliza 23:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks mate

for your birthday greeting. It has been a while since we talked, partially due to both of our inactive periods of editing. The next 2 months will be my most active months until late November 2007 when I would have finished high school because of summer holidays (I live down under in case you forgot). Cheers GizzaChat © 06:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Buddhism in modern India

India Buddhist revival/Dalit Buddhist Movement/Buddhist Revival in India has been moved to Buddhism in modern India. utcursch | talk 15:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Buddhism in modern India

Like I mentioned, that you and User:Hkelkar were justified in moving the article to "Dalit Buddhist movement", because it talked only about Ambedkar and his followers. I've added some stuff at Buddhism in modern India#Origins -- it wasn't Ambedkar who started the revival. It was Anagarika Dharmapala. I will expand the article to include some info about non-Ambedkarite Buddhism. This article is too large to fit in Buddhism in India. Besides, merging will only make Buddhism in India controversial. Also, this will prevent users like User:Pkulkarni from finding a reason to raise anti-Hindu rant. I am wondering whether this user is an avatar of User:P K aya Kulkarni, whom I warned in October for fanatic anti-Brahmin/Maratha/Patel edits. utcursch | talk 17:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Buddhism in modern India2

I do not have any personal quarrel with you. But the name Buddhism in modern India is proper. Because India got independance since 1947 and we also became one country. The Buddhist conversion Movement initiated by Dr. Ambedkar is in 1956. So the title is proper. It is true because of compelte separation of Buddhism from Hinduism and 22 vows many Hindus don't like the the minority Buddhists in India but that is not our problem. You can contribute positively in Buddhist and other religion related articles. Please share your views also. Pkulkarni 18:03, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I respect the Dalai Lama, to me he represents Buddhism in modern India, not a crew of rioters. From what I read in TiE or the Hindu, the Dalai Lama and respected Buddhist leaders are closest to the BJP if anything.Bakaman 03:03, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
As you might be aware that Pkulkarni (talk • contribs) and his/her socks have been blocked (see Talk:Dalit Buddhist movement). User:Pkulkarni (with his sock accounts) was the only person opposed to an article with the title Dalit Buddhist movement or Ambedkarite Buddhism. Other involved parties such as User:Hkelkar, User:AMbroodEY, Nat Krause[1], and NinaEliza[2] support for separate article about Dalit Buddhist movement. So, I've moved the article to Dalit Buddhist movement. The content about non-Ambedkarite Buddhism has been removed and addded to Buddhism in India[3]. Sorry for all the confusion. I hope I'm finally fixing this. Thanks. utcursch | talk 15:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Pkulkarni

Given this user's persistence, I'd strongly recommend bringing him up on WP:ANI if he hasn't been already, because a community ban may need to be discussed. --Coredesat 22:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

In that case, you should probably start a new thread there so it can be brought to other admins' attention. We can't ban anyone without community consensus (though an indefinite block could be reasonable, but I'd like to get advice from others on how to deal with it first). --Coredesat 22:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue VII - December 2006

The December 2006 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 23:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Hkelkar

This case is now closed and the results have been posted above.

For the Arbitration committee, Cowman109Talk 06:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Anti-Brahmanism, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/m/b/User_talk%7EAMbroodEY_458b.html"