Talk:Alternative rock

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good articles Alternative rock has been listed as a good article under the good-article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do.
If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a review.
This article is related to WikiProject Music genres, a user driven attempt to cleanup and standardise music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the project guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good and 1.0 standards.
Good article GA Alternative rock has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Kim Gordon and Thurston Moore of Sonic Youth This article is part of the Alternative music WikiProject, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Alternative rock, and who are involved in developing and proposing standards for their content, presentation and other aspects. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.

Contents

[edit] Alternative "music"?

recontextualize? WTF does that mean?

In my experience, this style of music is generally referred to as "Alternative rock". See What links here. I plan to move the page unless objections are raised.

Acegikmo1 20:58, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

I don't know about anywhere else, but in Britain it's definitely "Alternative music". --Steinsky 13:36, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
That's interesting. Is any distinction made between "alternative rock" and "indie music" in Britain? The most common term in the United States is "alternative rock" (2,070,000 Google hits). I have heard "alternative music" (376,000 Google hits) used here, but it's definately less common. Acegikmo1 13:46, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
In my experience Alternative Music and Alternative Rock are different things. Not come across Alternative rock a lot but I always take it to mean Indie (I'mf rom UK) and Alternative Music to refer to a wide variety of genres (see my post lower down the page)
There are alternatives bands that don't play mainly in the rock genre IMO. --MacRusgail 14:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

I just call it "alternative".67.188.172.165 19:00, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Linkin Park?

Should Linkin Park really be mentioned in this article? I'd hardly consider them representative of alternative. Modern mainstream music does not really reflect the original styles or ethics of alternative rock. Much of what still gets mislabeled "alternative" seems to be mere shallow imitations of the true form, and I'd say Linkin Park is amongst these bands. Modern mainstream rock may have some influences from alternative, but it is definitely not alternative itself. -- LGagnon 17:43, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)

  • Changed Last para to reflect how Linkin Park is a descendent of grunge. MPS21:20, 10 Sep 2004 (UTC)
Probably, the dumbass which classified Linkin Park as "alternative rock" dislikes hip hop and has forgotten that LP features a rapper - i.e. Mike Shinoda - in its line-up. Only hip hop detractors (or Shinoda detractors, perhaps?) call LP "alternative rock".

[edit] Pixies?

I think Pixies should be mentioned as a significant 80's alternative rock band, not least because they form a 'missing link' here, having been influenced by Husker Du, and being the main influence on Nirvana.

(And that's a statement of fact, not opinion. These influences were acknowledged by the bands themselves. Of course, in my opinion they hold their own very well against these other bands.)

-130.242.128.121

I agree. Do you want to make some changes to the article regarding the Pixies?
Acegikmo1 18:20, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I edited this entry to mention Pixies, and some idiot changed it back. Like them or not, Pixies had a huge influence on alternative rock and should not be overlooked.

The problem with your edit is that you failed to comprehend the sentence. the sentence says, "Notable alternative bands of the early and mid-1980s include R.E.M., Sonic Youth, The Replacements, and Hüsker Dü from the United States, and New Order, The Smiths, The Cure, and The Jesus and Mary Chain from the United Kingdom." The Pixies relased their first album in 1987. dditionally, if we change the sentence to say in the entire decade instead of early on and only listing integral bands to the development of alternative rock, then we have list a lot more bands. What makes the Pixies more important than Dinosaur Jr, Throwing Muses, the Stone Roses, Happy Mondays, and a great many more bands that emerged in the late 80's? It's unnecessary for that sentence. if you want the Pixies mentioned (and I think they should, but the way), write about them in a separte sentence. WesleyDodds 01:54, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
"What makes the Pixies more important than Dinosaur Jr, Throwing Muses, the Stone Roses, Happy Mondays, and a great many more bands that emerged in the late 80's?" Well to start, there's their overwhelming influence: Nirvana, Radiohead, and Smashing Pumpkins were three of the biggest-selling alternative acts ever, and all were inspired by the Pixies. For more info about their "importance," check out http://aleceiffel.free.fr/misc_said.html

[edit] Alternative Rock stemming from Jazz vs. Regular Rock from Blues?

Regular Rock and Roll with the BASIC 4-4 time signature came from Blues music perfected in Chicago as well as country music. The reason Alternative Rock seems to be called Alternative is from its subtleness taken from Jazz time signature styles, primarily. Jazz was invented in New Orleans, Louisiana.

When you listen to bands like Phish verses The Grateful Dead the similarities are very similar but with one major difference. Phish seems like an alternative band compared to GD being a straight rock style. Phish’s emphasis seems geared more toward Jazzy “off-beat-type” riffs.

This makes Alternative Rock feel less “booming, solid or definitive” as compared to Regular 4-4 Rock. But Alternative music seems sexier and more descriptive because of less emphasis on time signature and more on substance and fluidity.

I'm not so sure Phish counts as alternative rock. Maybe if you gave a better example I might agree. -- LGagnon 22:17, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
I also think your recent additions are questionable. You did not wait for discussion to be made first before adding jazz and funk to the influences. In my opinion, they should not be added there. I also do not think Art rock should be considered a derivative form, since it has been around longer. -- LGagnon 22:22, Nov 18, 2004 (UTC)
alternative rock stems from punk, man. any similarities between most alternative bands and jazz is more coincidental than you think, or it is intentional experimenatation within the genre. 67.172.61.222 21:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, a lot of early punk bands had definite jazz influences, including Crass, The Damned, John Lydon, The Clash, The Slits and others. A lot of jazz found its way into alternative rock that way. --Switch 10:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] US centred article

Perhaps understandably so, this article is incredibly US-centred. For instance, writing that alternative music was only played on this or that college station entirely ignores that while it might have been marginal in the US, it was not at all so in the UK and other places, such as Australia, or Germany, where neue Deutsche Welle ruled the charts in the early to mid 80s. I had to stop rewriting it when I got to the part that suggested that alternative bands did not have spectacular sales. This is complete nonsense. It might be true of the US, but it certainly isn't of other countries. The UK used to have "indie" charts that ran alongside the regular ones, and it wasn't uncommon for records to top both. Dr Zen 08:46, 27 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Yep, this is definitly a "The US slept during the 80's" article. It looks like someone who grew up with MTVs "Alternative Nation" wrote it. -- 212.80.224.243
The article doesn't seem entirely US-centric; there's some info on the UK and other countries. And, might I add, some of us editors are American and can't really tell you what happened on the other side of the pond that well. Thus, those who are from other countries should add in what needs to be added that they know. If you know what needs to be added, then by all means add it in. -- LGagnon 18:05, Apr 10, 2005 (UTC)
If you think this is bad, see the Generation X page. Indie was massive in the UK in the turn of the 90s, e.g. Happy Mondays, Stone Roses, and Britpop was really just a commercialised breakthrough for many (former?) alternative bands that had been going for years before on the Indie scene. Britpop itself sold millions of records, although it's unclear whether all the bands were really that alternative. --MacRusgail 14:26, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Major vandalism on this page.

[edit] Favor vs favour

Apperantly someone didn't get the point of having the British spelling used for the part about British English and the American spelling in the part about American English. It's too bad; the sentence was one of the more interesting ones I've written on Wikipedia. -- LGagnon 22:23, 3 December 2005 (UTC) change it back, then. it's perfectly acceptable. 67.172.61.222 21:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Other bands

The article mostly focuses on Nirvana in the mid 90s...but that really isn't all that true. Back in the early 90s, Nirvana was considered "grunge" and while Nirvana DID help punk bands come into the mainstream, by the mid 90s the word "alternative" was no longer associated with solely Nirvana. In fact, from what I remember from 1994-1995 period, when someone mentioned alternative music, pop-punkish bands like Greenday and Offspring would come to mind. Flyerhell 05:58, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

The article does acknowledge that. And there's only a paragraph or so about the 90's so it's not a disproportionate about of text given to Nirvana (who were very important in the history of alternative rock). WesleyDodds 23:44, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] List of alternative/indie music genres

I propose spliting off the current list of alternative rock genres into an article titled "List of alternative/indie music genres". The reason for this is I plan to add more genres to the list than space might allow for future additions to the body of the article, and to list indie genres (that is, genre called "indie" after alternative went mainstream), which currently do not have a definitive listing on Wikipedia. Alternative and indie are used interchangeably enough (especially in regards to genres like Shoegazing, noise pop, post-rock, and others) that I feel such an article title would be the most appropriate heading. I'm using AMG's genre Alternative/Indie rock database as an example of what this list would contain, although due to the nature of Wikipedia we could list far more in number and those in general obscurity.

The list would include genres like grunge, Britpop, shoegazing, indie rock, twee pop, psychobilly, industrial rock, C86, grebo, space rock, post-rock, post-punk revival, gothic rock, Paisley Underground, noise pop, noise rock, jangle pop, dream pop, geek rock, alternative metal, Madchester, Christian alternative music, lo-fi, sadcore, slowcore, math-rock, and more. We could leave a short sentence on this page listing at least a few of the more notable genres (such as grunge, Britpop, and gothic rock) along with the link to the list page.

Any thoughts either way about this? WesleyDodds 09:47, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

Are you sure there's enough to warrant another article? We could just split it into columns the way the list at Cult television is split. I don't think that would take up too much space. -- LGagnon 17:40, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
That might a good way to do it. But we should also account for future expansion of the main article itself. Right now a lot more can be added about the history of and opinions on alternative rock. Also, those were just the styles I could think of off the top of my head. There's certainly smaller scenes that could be listed, and a page solely devoted to genres might help highlight them. Lastly, there are people who would probably be searching for "Indie genres" instead of "Alternative genres" (especially in the UK) so an article title that references both might help out. WesleyDodds 11:47, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
We can always fork the article when it needs to be forked, not when it doesn't. Until the article is big enough to need it, I think it's best to keep the info here. And as for indie genres, why not put that list on the indie rock article? -- LGagnon 19:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm not necessarily talking about Indie rock, but Indie music. Many people use the the phrase "indie" when referring to alternative music. WesleyDodds 00:16, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Still, that does not mean we have to have both lists in the same place. -- LGagnon 02:54, 8 January 2006 (UTC)
Actually it does, for reference purposes, since "indie" and "alternative" are sometimes used interchangebly as umbrella terms for the genre. Anyways, I think your proposal for the list would work for now. If I list as many genres as I can, can you arrange them into the column-style list format? WesleyDodds 06:59, 8 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Splitting of Article

I propose the splitting of this article into Alternative Rock and ALternative Music as in my experience these mean too different things although I have not enoucntered the term or style of Alternative ROck that often.

Alternative Rock Article: To describe a specific style in line with other such musical genres as Punk and Heavy metal

Alternative Music: Now im sure they'll be some disagreement about this BUT in my experience Alternative Music is used as an umbrella term to cover a variety of musical genres including Punk, Indie, Emo, Metal, Gothic Rock and youth scenes including Goth, Emo, Grunger, Punk, Metalhead etc. The followers of these scenes often have overlapping musical tastes, attitudes and friendship groups (i.e metalheads hang with Grungers without problems when many metalheads would not hang with a chav simply becuase they are a chav) The Article does not properly reflect this use of the term and is geared more towards Alternative Rock as a Musical Style and its history.

Metal is not alternative. You seem to be concerned with pushing a POV that you haven't given any proof for. Do you have any sources that prove your point? -- LGagnon 22:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
This is a common misperception. "Alternative" is meant to refer not merely to an outsider mentality, although that's how it got it's name. Rather, it refers to post-punk music genres developed in the indie scenes of various regions that exised outside of the mainstream for the most part until the 90's (which is why bands like Oasis are called alternative, because they emerged from the Manchester indie scene). This excludes both metal and non-alternative forms of punk (emo and pop-punk are occasionally lumped in with alternative). Terms like Alternative metal, Alternative hip-hop, and Alternative country exist, but these are largely devised in relation to their overall genre, and do not necessarily have any connection to alternative rock (although Alternative metal at times is' alternative rock, as are a scant few alt. country bands like Wilco). "Alternative" does have a lot of connotations in popular culture, but here it refers to this particular phenomenon. WesleyDodds 04:08, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alternative Pop rock

I redirected alternative Pop rock to this page since that isn't a common term. Here's the text from that page. Tuf-Kat 06:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

That text is exactly the description for Alternative rock on AMG, copied and pasted. It's a good thing you noticed that and redirected the link. WesleyDodds 06:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

In the interest of keeping copyright violations off Wikipedia, I've deleted that info. -- LGagnon 22:45, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alternative on radio

There's a line in the Overview I've long wondered about:

In the late 1970s and early 1980s only CFNY, a commercial radio station in Toronto, Ontario, regularly broadcasted alternative rock in North America.

There's a number of things murky about this. First of all, alternative rock didn't really come into its own until the mid-80's or so. Certainly no one called bands later identified as alternative that in the late 70's. Additionally, many modern radio station that play alternative rock and call themselves alternative stations these days certainly didn't play alternative rock until the very end of the 80's at the earliest. KROQ, for one, primarily played punk, New Wave, and other modern rock pretty much until 1990; they certainly didn't play alt-rock as much as college radio did. There's a reason it was called college rock. Also, looking back at the history this line was added by an unregistered user who only made edits in the alternative and punk rock pages having to do with Canada. I mean, it's great that there's an effort to add a more global perspective to the subject, but this just doesn't seem accurate.

What is the connotation here for "alternative"? Is it just that CFNY played a lot of left-of-center music? That doesn't mean it played "alternative" in the genre sense. From the looks of it, it was simply a freeform station that ended up focusing on alt-rock later in its history, much like KROQ. Unless someone can confirm that CFNY was playing early alternative rock artists on a regular basis in the early 80's, I feel we should take this line out. WesleyDodds 10:04, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

It's unreferenced and extremely sketchy; feel free to remove it. If someone has any complaints, let them show some research to back it up before it gets added back in. -- LGagnon 14:53, 8 March 2006 (UTC)

The majority of music played by WLIR on Long Island in the early to middle '80 consisted of New Wave, Novelty hits and Techno Pop. However REM ,New Order The Cure and later The Alarm and The Smiths were in very heavy rotation. Husker Du and The Replacements were in light rotation by the mid 80's. One thing I have never understood is why here and elsewhere The Cure and New Order are considered alternative rock. They are synthesizer based not guitar based. The Cure musically were and are New Wave lyrically and visually proto Goth. New Order were techno innovators. The only reason for these two bands to be included are if you consider any post Velvet Underground genre alternative. If you make that case then KROQ and the Toronto station must be included. 4:00, 9, March 2006 (EK)

The Cure is considered alternative rock because they are a gothic rock band, which is pretty straightforward criteria. They also have a fairly eclectic sound. They can be considered New Wave for only brief periods: their first album and the post-Pornography phase {"Let's Go to Be", "The Walk", "The Lovecats"). New Order are alternative because, even though they were a dance band, they approached dance music coming from a punk/post-punk/indie perspective, while still emphasizing their rock side on certain tracks. They were also probably the most high-profile and successful indie band in Britain in the 80s, being the flagship band for Factory Records. WesleyDodds 23:07, 9 March 2006 (UTC)
Which is not to say that just because a radio station plays The Cure or New Order means they play "alternative rock". "Blue Monday" is the best-selling 12" single of all time, after all, and like you satid New Order is commonly considered a dance band by those who know litle about the band itself (which is common since they rarely gave interviews in the 80s). Both bands in the mid-to-late 80s fit comfortably on New Wave/modern rock radio playlists like KROQ while still receiving heavy rotation on college radio. If anything they were the more mainstream examples of early alternative rock at a time when it was almost exclusively uderground. WesleyDodds 23:24, 9 March 2006 (UTC).
I would say for the purposes of maybe putting WLIR into the article that it would be incorrect to say that WLIR during the time period we are discussing had an Alternative format but it would be correct to say the station played Alternative Music 3:00, 10 March 2006 (EK)

I found a book in my archives call "Rock Yearbook 1985" which provided an in depth review of 1984. There was an article called "The Declaration of the Independents" by David Fricke which analyzed the emerging underground American guitar rock scene. Here are some quotes relevant to this discussion "Consider the dee-jay on Los Angeles pionerring KROQ-FM last year took a break from the stations usuall diet of English synth-pop and cheap novelty records (howsabout a band called Killer Pussy?) to play taste of The Dream Synicate's Halloween from The Days of Wine and Roses. After only 30 seconds , he bruskly yanked the needle off the record and announced with misguided pride 'I like to give local bands a chance, but this is rediculous. You won't be hearing any more of that band on this station' ". "MTV relegates alternative rock videos like REM's dreamlike Radio Free Europe to the 4am graveyard shift". And from The Year in Music - Rock article by Adam Sweeting "the drab New Order" "These faceless artisons managed to lodge the impenatrably forgettable Blue Monday into the UK charts for months end" "New Order remain one of the great unsolved crimes". Notable from above. 1. You were correct about KROQ 2. The term "Alternative" was in use by 1984 3. The New Order quotes shows how much history really does change prespective 3:45, 10 March 2006 (EK)

[edit] Christian alternative rock

I merged Christan alternative rock here. There was very little "real" information in the parent article. Given the similar amount of content in many of the alternative rock articles, I suggest perhaps a list of alternative music genres with included stubs? --MikeJ9919 23:23, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

I reverted the merge since placing that here emphasized one genre over all others, particularly one only tangentally involved with alternative rock as a whole, and it looked cumbersome. Plans are underway to expand this article, but I don't think genre stubs would be effective. Just look at List of heavy metal genres. WesleyDodds 23:43, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alternative Dance

Anyone familar with this genre? New Order was the first Alternative Dance act. 72.130.198.232 06:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

I've only seen that term used on Allmusic as a broad label to describe bands like New Order and later Public Image Ltd. as well as covering more dance-oriented alt-rock genres like Madchester/baggy and grebo. WesleyDodds 10:27, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Audio samples

I'm not too familiar with how audio samples work or are uploaded on Wikipedia, but I think we should have some for this page. We should post samples of bands highly identified with alternative while still showing how diverse it is. There's a few already on certain band pages that would work fine as examples, but some others would need to be upload. Can someone take care of this?

I think for starters we should have one sample each from Nirvana, R.E.M., Sonic Youth, Husker Du, The Cure, The Smiths, and Smashing Pumpkins. Then from that point we can figure out what other artists should be represented. WesleyDodds 01:37, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

If I had more free time, I'd make those samples myself. In the meantime, I suggest downloading Audacity and creating some yourself as per the guidelines (it's not hard to do even for a beginner). And I've got a few song recommendations in case you need some:
"Something I Learned Today" by Husker Du
"Teenage Riot" by Sonic Youth
"How Soon Is Now?" by The Smiths
"Today" by The Smashing Pumpkins
Those are all pretty obvious choices, but still they are pretty iconic songs of each band and serve as good examples. -- LGagnon 04:10, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
I don't have much free time either (or tech-savvy) so hopefully when I start up the Alternative Wikiproject in the next day or so someone can sign up for it. Your choices are great, but I'd trade "How Soon Is Now?" for "What Difference Does it Make?" or "This Charming Man" (which is already on the Smiths article page) since even fans and critics agree that "How Soon is Now?" is in no way representative of the band's style. I also think a Husker Du song from New Day Rising and onwards might work better, since "Something I Learned Today" still is very much a hardcore track.
Other suggestions:
R.E.M. "So. Central Rain"
The Cure - "One Hundred Years", "Just like Heaven" or "In Between Days"
The Jesus & Mary Chain - "You Trip Me Up"
The Replacements - "Bastards of Young"
Jane's Addiction - "The Mountain Song"
The Stone Roses - "Elephant Stone"
Dinosaur Jr - "Freak Scene"
Pixies - "Debaser"
My Bloody Valentine - "Only Shallow"
Pearl Jam - "Not For You"
Soundgarden - "Black Hole Sun"
Oasis - "Supersonic"
Pavement - "Cut Your Hair"
Radiohead - "Karma Police"
Franz Ferdinand - "Take Me Out"
Obviously not all of these would be up, but they're just things to think about and discuss. WesleyDodds 04:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
Admittedly, "How Soon Is Now?" is representative of The Smiths style, but it is one of those alt songs that stands out as an icon of the genre. And I chose "Something I Learned Today" as it shows the movement from hardcore to alt (as the song is, IMO, halfway between the two genres).
I like your choices for The Replacements, Pixies, and Dinosaur Jr. All 3 bands should be included as they are amongst the most important 80s alt bands. The others seem like good choices too, though I'm not sure all of them need to be added. What we need mainly is samples of the most important bands and bands that represent a variety of different subgenres.
I think what you should work on for now is giving finding a justification for each band that you want to add. If they you can't find a reason for them to be considered important or representative of a subgenre, then you can throw them to the side for now. This at least seems like a good place to start with determining what we should and shouldn't include. -- LGagnon 16:39, 24 March 2006 (UTC)
For Husker Du, I was thinking "Celebrated Summer" would be a way more effective song for the same point, because it alternates between fast intense verses and quiet acoustic breaks, making explicit the contrast and symbolically tearing down hardcore and helping give birth to alternative in the process. It's also quite acclaimed.
Searching through the fair use samples already on Wikipedia, I managed to find the Replacements' "Unsatisfied" and R.E.M.'s "Radio Free Europe". I already posted "Unsatisfied" on the Let It Be page, but "Radio Free Europe" has a fair use notice that is only written to apply for the Music from Athens, Georgia page where it is currently being used. So I'm wondering about that one.
I was thinking of picking a band each from major subgenres, but that won't necessarily work since a band might not have great influence or importance on alt-rock as a whole outside of its genre. I was thinking about that when trying to think of a Britpop song to list (which is why I settled on "Supersonic" because it has loud "indie" guitars). That's why it's better to choose The Cure over Bauhaus or The Sisters of Mercy. Luckily some bands have a huge influence on a number of subgenres, like the Smiths, Sonic Youth, the Jesus and Mary Chain, and R.E.M., or are hugely important to the development of alternative as a whole, such as Husker Du, the Replacements, and Nirvana, or are very visible and successful examples of alternative rock that cannot be associated with any one particular subgenre, like Smashing Pumpkins and Radiohead WesleyDodds 23:23, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Alternative" that's not alternative

During the early 1990s, several black artists were labeled "alternative" just because they played music that most black people didn't play at that time. Living Colour was heavy metal & blues mixed, but got labelled alternative. Tracy Chapman played folk but was called alt. These are just two examples of the odd categorization that black musicians were put into if they didn't play pop, r&b, or rap. None of those mislabelled based their music in punk, which was the defining characteristic of alternative. Still, the mainstream music industry still gave them this label to cash in on alt's popularity.

Additionally, I'd like to mention that I'm removing Alternative hip-hop from the genre list. It's not punk-based, and thus is only connected to this music form by its name. I'll move it to the See also section, though, since the name at least gives a reason to footnote it. -- LGagnon 02:55, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

The alternative hip-hop label occurs mainly because it was an "alternative" to mainstream hip-hop (read: gangster rap) at the time; I don't think it was necessarily meant to refer to alternative rock. Unlike alternative metal and alternative dance, which have "alternative" in the name because they meld alternative rock proper with other genres. It might be wise to put a short sentence in the alt hip-hop page about the context of the name. We probably don't need to link it here.
On a related note, I've long wondered if we should add alternative country to the list, since the "alt. country" movement has revolved around such undisputedly alternative/indie bands like Uncle Tupelo and its spinoff groups Wilco and Son Volt. On the other hand, the lists of artists on the page is so broad that it pretty much included any country artists off the beaten path like Merle Haggard WesleyDodds 08:52, 8 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] The re-write

The re-write that has been done twice now by Onurkaryagmaz is in fact a copyvio from bandbiographies. I've given him a waning about using copyvio text. --GraemeL (talk) 13:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

While that rewrite is certainly bad, I have been thinking of reworking the article for a long time. Primarily, I mean creating a detailed history of alternative rock split along national lines, so there's a section on American alternative rock and British alternative, followed by the rest of the world. This is precipitated by my noticing that while the overview starts with an all-encompassing view it becomes US-centric by the time it talks about Nirvana's breakthrough. Plus it's couldn't hurt to try and gived a detailed history of alt-rock, which really doesn't exist anywhere. What do you all think? WesleyDodds 01:55, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

That sounds good. Just try not to turn the article into the confused mess that other rewrite made and it should work out. -- LGagnon 12:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
I've commenced with the revamp. Obviously I still have more work to do; this is just to get the bulk of it on the page at the moment. WesleyDodds 02:10, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I'm curious about the revert you did to re-add the first reference and the prosaic bit about owing a debt of gratitude to punk rock... Both of them smell of original research, or failing that, should be cited. Xinit 03:26, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Alt-rock emerged from the indie scene set up by punk rock as well as its ideals. I've added a reference now, but this sentiment is echoed by a number of books and essays beyodn that citation. WesleyDodds 10:20, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] References

Please don't just add references and expect the reader to know what they are references for. Add citations so we know what they are backing up. -- LGagnon 03:56, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I thought I made it clear that I would be working on this gradually. So citations will show up, but most likely not all at once. Most of the info can be found in those essays I linked as resources if you wish to verify what I've added. I'll pull in as many other sources as I can, but I'm rather busy at the moment. But rest assured I'm not making this all up, and hopefully the in next month or so the page should be drastically revamped and expanded. WesleyDodds 10:18, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
I know you aren't making it up, but it would be best that you don't add a reference before you decide what to cite with it. Feel free to add anything else that helps back up your claims (or anyone else's), as you can never have too many references (unless you're being redundant, of course). On a related note, please give page numbers when you cite books (the Azerrad citations currently lack them). Thanks and keep up the good work. -- LGagnon 23:46, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Contemporary sources?

Do we have any sources from the 80s that veirfy that the term has been used back then? In my memory the term was only widely used after the Nirvana revolution increased interest in formerly independent acts enough so that lots of them signed up with major label and got listed on mail order clubs like BMG or Columbiahouse. Of course they couldn't use "indie" since it implied independent label, so the used alternative as a replacement. ~ trialsanderrors 03:00, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

If you scroll up on the Talk Page, you'll see a reference from 1984. "Alternative" is certainly in use by 1989 when New Order, PiL, and the Sugarcubes go out on the "Monsters of Alternative Rock" tour. By 90-91 it's pretty common (relatively speaking). For example, the Guitar World article on the first Lollapalooza from Summer 1991 uses the phrase "alternative rock".
Also, keep in mind a lot of the major alt-rock bands of the late-80s/early 90's were already signed to major labels when Nirvana broke through. WesleyDodds 09:44, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks. This should probably be included in the article to verify the 80's usage claim. ~ trialsanderrors 18:38, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alt Rock vs New Wave

What's the precise difference? It strikes me that a lot of bands who would nowadays be "alternative", e.g. Television were called punk at the time, and would have been known as New Wave in the late 70s, early 80s, and alternative in the late 80s to present. --MacRusgail 14:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

It's all punk, really, but these are specific terms for certain versions of it. Still, we probably should make a distinction between new wave and alt. -- LGagnon 15:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
How hard it is to define New Wave and how that definition has changed over the years is dealt with in the New Wave article and discussion page. As I mentioned in the New Wave discussion page I have a broad view of what is New Wave. That said from what I see A Flock of Seagulls would be considered the prototypical New Wave band from a 2006 perspective. Differences would be Alternative would more rock to New Wave’s pop. Alternative would be more guitar driven (how would Industrial fit into this?). New Wave fashion and hair styles would be more colorful. Again not that I really agree with this but this seems the most common view. 02:32, 12 June 2006 (EK)
In general "New Wave and "alternative" refer to two very different things. New Wave is post punk (in the broad sense) music that emerged right after punk rock (around '78 or so) that often was very successful. Alternative rock came a bit later, mainly out of post-punk (the genre) and hardcore, and was mainly underground. Some bands are considered both New Wave and alternative, but not a lot really. Off the top of my head I can think of The Cure, New Order, XTC, and maybe a few others. They really have no direct evolutional connection like alternative has with hardcore and post-punk, where the bands start off in those styles and then become alternative. I suppose the main difference between the genres is that in the 80s New Wave was played on commercial stations like KROQ but you could only find alternative on college radio. That, and alternative by and large revolves around the guitar. Simon Reynolds in his recent book on post-punk writes in the afterword about how post-punk and New Wave were relatively futurist (particularly in the use of synths) while the alternative/indie rock that began to emerge in the early 80's was more about rejecting the contemporary music mainstream usually by way of incorporating influence from the past. There's a paragraph where he defines R.E.M. and the Smiths as "the most important alt-rock bands of the day" by how they embraced the guitar and recalled the past through various ways. Once I get that book back from a friend I'm going to work in some references from it, even though the space he devotes directly to alternative rock in the book is less than ten pages.
By the way, Television isn't considered an alternative band. WesleyDodds 23:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
How would The Velvet Underground be considered? 01:49,14 June 2006 (EK)
Most music critics and fans from what I've seen simply call them protopunk. WesleyDodds 06:23, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] MTV

The program 120 Minutes , http://www.altmusictv.com/120/index.html, http://www.altmusictv.com/120/archive.html which started airing as early as 1986 (with VJ J.J.Jackson would you believe). was instrumental in breaking most of the bands mentioned in the article. The program Alternative Nation aired on MTV during alternatives early to mid 1990’s heyday. Of note VJ Kennedy became iconic of what a “alterna chick” should look and sound like 69.114.117.103 02:30, 14 July 2006 (EK)

I agree completely with EK. MTV was instrumental in breaking bands such as Inxs, Duran Duran, and of course "Video Killed the Radio Star," Boy George, Thompson Twins, Devo, which can be considered new wave bands, and played them over and over all day long. I think it would be useful to list New Wave and the mainstreaming of New Wave as a major, if not THE precursor to the mainstreaming of Alternative. In this case, MTV plays a vital role.

I'm not so sure MTV played that big of a role that early on. MTV didn't really help alt rock until after Nirvana got big, as they were still backing hair metal as the big thing in rock until then. They may claim otherwise, but they are known to lie (for instance, they'd like you to forget the racist policies they implimented in the pre-"Thriller" days, and that they didn't get rid of them until Jackson's label complained). Please don't insert MTV's historic revisionism into the article. -- LGagnon 15:05, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
I did not forget MTV racist past but it is irrelevant to the question of what role MTV had or did not have in “breaking” alternative rock. But like them or not MTV was responsible for video being a major force in breaking new acts in the 80’s (which video is not today also in part due to MTV). You can argue correctly that college radio had these acts “first” and that 120 minutes had a very limited audience due to it’s being relegated to the “cult” timeslot of Midnight to 2AM Sunday Night/Monday morning. But college radio also had a limited audience and 120 minutes played bands shortly after college radio discovered them. Some people listened to college radio and had 120 minutes reinforce their interest in certain bands. Others first saw these bands on 120 minutes. We can debate how big a role MTV had but I do it think it had enough of a role in the early days to a least get a mention in the article. As for after Nirvana VJ Kennedy was almost as big a cultural figure for a few years as Nirvana and Pearl Jam (who musical style I think is more 70’s hard rock then alternative or grunge). She probably does not belong here but in the alternative culture article. 14:44, 15 July 2006 (EK)
Certainly 120 Minutes is a notable component in the history of alternative rock, but I really don't think it had much to do with "breaking" alternative into the mainstream. Certainly it was one of the only venues you could catch a lot of this music outside of college radio. But then again, it waws pretty much a late-night ghetto, kind of like a low-key "Headbanger's Ball". Alternative artists were expected to be played on 120 Minutes. From what I recall, Come As You Are mentions that while the "Smells Like Teen Spirit" video had a world premire on 120 Minutes, the real breakthrough was when the video started showing up in MTV's regular rotation. When alternative hit it big, then 120 Minutes was in the perfect position to capitalize on it. If it is added to the article, it warrants just a brief mention. WesleyDodds 20:46, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
I do agree with the brief mention and will put it in the "Overview" section. I think we have had in this debate a miscommunication on what I meant by "breaking" alternative acts. I meant by that term being among the first to expose alternative acts. I did not mean “breakthrough” or the sudden explosion of alternative starting in the fall of 1991. Theories as to why the Nirvana phenomenon happened probably deserves a section of its own 01:45, 18 July 2006 (Ed Kollin)

[edit] self contradiction

"However, in 2004 the sound of alternative rock returned to the mainstream with the popularity of indie rock and post-punk revival artists such as Modest Mouse and Franz Ferdinand, respectively.[1] This revival has caused a big stir in the rock music community and has opened the door for the renewed interest in classic alternative bands."

hasn't "alternative rock" (yes, i know it's not remotely alternative anymore, but stylistically) been mainstream since about 1993? what makes the rock bands of circa 2002 any more or less "alternative" than modest mouse et. al.? even the intro mentions that much mainstream music of the past decade has been labelled "alternative". i take it this may be referring to the post-punk revival, but that in itself isn't much of a change in the direction of current music, either. 67.172.61.222 21:45, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

It's a good question...one that's been debated since 1993 at least. My personal opinion is that there are two alternative rock camps. One called "modern rock" and the other "indie". That doesn't solve anything unfortunately. And it gets more confusing now that people are calling stuff like The Killers and Elefant "indie". maxcap 22:04, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
Alternative rock certainly lost much of its commercial clout in the late 90s, with even major established acts like Pearl Jam, Hole, and Smashign Pumpkins having disappointing sales. It was supplanted by nu metal and pop punk in mainstream prominence at the time. There were a number of articles saying alternative was dead or rock was dead at the time; MTV and Guitar World even eliminated their categories for alternative rock in awards ceremonies around 1999. Still, that paragraph could probably use a rewrite. Someone added it a while ago and I pretty much left it alone since it covered a period that hadn't been addressed before. But certainly people have been talking about a revival of alternative rock in the last few years, from that SPIN magazine article I referenced to the emergence of "Classic alternative" radio formats. WesleyDodds 20:56, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

"Has returned to the mainstream". In the years 1997 thru 2002 alternative music did not go through a radical overhaul in style and continued to chart thus presenting an argument against that statement. But those years will be remembered as the Boyband, Britney Spears era and the last four years will be remembered for the post punk, new new wave revival or whatever you want to call it which is an argument for that statement. 15:28, 16 July 2006 (Ed Kollin)

[edit] GA nomination

I am placing this article's GA nomination on hold for seven days, because while it has no problems that I consider showstoppers, it needs some fixing. Specifically:

  • The article needs a thorough copyedit for proper grammar.
  • The lead paragraph tells us that "alternative rock" is made up of bands, but later says it is a genre, made up of other genres. I don't think it adequately defines the term or introduces the concept of sub-genres within a large genre.
  • Consider renaming "Overview" to "History".
  • There are sections for alternative rock in the US and the UK. It didn't exist anywhere else? Even if there is nothing significant to cover, at least include a paragraph concerning alt rock's effects in other countires.

Thanks! --Aguerriero (talk) 22:35, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Conveniently I was planning to address a lot of those points anyway in the coming days. However, if someone can give the article a good copyediting (I can generally do that decently, except when it's something I have written myself) that would help immensely. WesleyDodds 21:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
I feel that you have done a good job addressing my points, and I have passed the article. Keep up the great work! --Aguerriero (talk) 14:21, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Sound samples scattered

The way that the sound samples are scattered throughout the article seems to be a bad stylistic choice. It makes editing the article a bit more confusing for newcomers, and pushes around the text in ways that are asthetically unpleasing to the eye. It'd probably be best if we just put all of them in their own section. -- LGagnon 21:04, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

I did it in an attempt to group the samples to relevant sections. However, I must admit I did this on a widescreen laptop, so I was not aware of how it looked on a normal screen. WesleyDodds 21:23, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Well, the concept is understandable, but I think it could have been better implemented. For one, the US song box should have been at the top of the section, and not touching the rest of the text. Also, I personally don't like having anything left-aligned in articles; it seems more natural for the text to be on the left side of a box (as English is read left to right). The UK box is a similar situation. It also wouldn't hurt to add the other 3 samples to those two boxes, as being separated looks odd and gives no explaination for why it is that way. -- LGagnon 02:11, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
The whole touching the text part is another result of performing the edit while on this computer; I looked at the page on another computer today and saw your edit looked fine. So yeah, my bad. As for the separate sound clips, I tried to arrange the clips in each section in order to provide context, so for example the British alt-rock clips roughly correspond to each paragraph (goth, Smiths-inspired indie rock, shoegaze, Britpop, and 2000s indie rock). While I tried to give equal weight to each facet of alternative rock and its history, I think we can all pretty much agree most notable alt-rock came out in the late 80s and 1990s. So rather than shove clips by Sonic Youth and Smashing Pumpkins into the sections (bands that are quite notable in alternative rock as a whole but in a sense redundant if the clips were placed alongside the Pixies and Nirvana ones), I just placed them at the bottom as a sort of "additional listening". I was also thinking about replacing the Cure clip with Bauhaus' "Bela Lugosi's Dead" (the song no one argues isn't a goth song) and putting a later Cure song like "In Between Days" or "Just Like Heaven" in the section at the bottom, since that's when they became really popular (trivia: 120 Minutes voted the "Just Like Heaven" video the greatest alternative video ever). A New Order clip was another consideration; there were a few dancey strains of alternative in the 80s that should probably be represented and while New Order is a major band from that period (best-selling 12" single of all time, even if it is technically a techno song), they were largely separate from the major trends. It's kind of annoying how idiosyncratic some alternative bands can be, and how they sometimes don't fit into clean-cut categories like grunge or shoegaze or indie pop, which I guess is part of the purpose of the section at the bottom. WesleyDodds 06:58, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Origins, omissions?

Surely new wave is a foundational genre of alternative rock? Bands missing: The Jam, Television, Talking Heads, Lou Reed, the Buzzcocks

None of those are alternative bands. In the case of Lou Reed, the start of his career preceeds the genre by nearly 20 years. WesleyDodds 11:53, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
New wave is not alternative. New wave was a variant of punk, which had been considered punk itself up until that sector of punk went mainstream. It wouldn't work to call it alt, given that alt really formulated after the glory days of hardcore started to wane. -- LGagnon 20:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
Post Punk might be a more of a correct foundational genre then New Wave 01:20, 24 July 2006 (Ed Kollin)

[edit] Page number missing

Our Band Could Be Your Life is missing the page number(s) for the citation. Please add this in, as that is standard for book citations. -- LGagnon 20:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What does this Page have against WLIR

Everything about MTV and KROQ mentioned applies to this station. By the 1982-1985 period New Order was in heavy rotation as was the Cure and The Smiths by the end of the period. REM got it's share of airplay. Long Island has three million people living there and the station was listened to in next door New York City because the commercial rock stations there at the time were album oriented rock 01:39, 24 July 2006 (Ed Kollin)

Nothing against the station. Just that in the process of reorganizing the section I felt that bit was unnecessary and made the paragraph too long. The paragraph says "Most commercial stations ignored the genre", which implies there was some sort of presence somewhere anyway. WesleyDodds 11:41, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
== The article has several inaccuracies and gives the short-shrift where commercial radio is concerned. KROQ, WLIR, and KQAK, alone, defined alternative music for millions of people prior to even 1985. When KITS came on in 1986, it was a ratings monster from the start. WFNX went full-time alternative in 1985. WOXY came into being in 1983; WHFS was playing the Jam as far back as 1979, and there are plenty more.--FemmyV 17:59, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
KROQ played mainly synthpop, New Wave, and post-punk through most of the 80s; you can check out their year-end countdowns here on Wikipedia as proof as this. The thing is a lot of things have been labeled alternative, but if you actually trace the roots of a lot of styles and bands a cleaer picture of what is and what isn't of the genre becomes clearer; some of what people might consider alternative rock during the 80s is often skewed towards what got commercial airplay during the day, when the roots of the alt-rock breakthrough in the 90s actually come from bands that were very underground. WesleyDodds 23:57, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Isn't Alternative Rock dying Out!!!

This maybe hard to ask, it is my favorite genre of music, but isn't Alternative Rock dying out of style. To me Alternative Rock seemed to be at its peak from 1991 to around 2001. It seems to me that Alternative Rock is starting to fade away as Nu Metal, Rap-Pop, and New Wave Music are taking over the Top-40 charts. Shouldn't there be a new genre to categorize the newer Alternative Rock bands, maybe a Post-Alternative Rock genre because the newer bands don't really fit the style of '90s alternative Rock. See Below...

Altenative Rock (1990s Alternative Rock) Examples

  • Green Day (before American Idiot)
  • Red Hot Chili Peppers
  • Smash Mouth
  • Barenaked Ladies
  • Smashing Pumpkins
  • Republica
  • Counting Crows
  • Third Eye Blind
  • Better Than Ezra
  • Chumbawamba
  • Offspring

Post-Alternative Rock (2000s Alternative Rock) Examples

  • All American Rejects
  • Ryan Cabrera
  • Bowling For Soup
  • Evan and Jaron
  • Fountains of Wayne
  • Franz Ferdinand
  • Jet
  • Keane
  • The Killers
  • Pink
  • Yellowcard

This post may seem POV to make a Post-Alternative Rock Page, but I as a fan of Alternative Rock of the '90s can tell a distinct difference in the music between Alt-Rock from the '90s and Alt-Rock of the 2000s. (Tigerghost 09:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC))

If you can find a notable reference to post-alt rock, create the article. Good luck. maxcap 18:17, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Alt-rock may be declining in popularity, but it isn't dying out. There's that sizable subgenre known as indie rock, after all. WesleyDodds 22:36, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
Those bands you listed for 2000's have among other names still been called "alternative". I have not myself read the seen term "post-alternative". But as said above if you find a notable reference go for it. 21:07, 6 August 2006 (Ed Kollin)
OK! I Googled it and a lot of bands claim to be Post-Alternative Rock. However I can't seem to find any solid evidence that it is a real term or if they've just made it up, most are in the indie scene. Some Alt-Rock from the '90s came up such as the band Cake, but I believe they are too early to be in that category. 2002 seems to be the year coined that Post-Alternative hit big with "Swing, Swing" by the All-American Rejects and "Curbside Prophet/The Remedy" by Jason Mraz. But again those two examples are just my opinion...Does anyone know of any major bands claiming to be Post-Alt Rock because that would be enough proof to star an article??? Welker, a band I believe fits the idea of Post-Alt. They even state their Post-Alt(Tigerghost 01:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC))

I'm not so sure about the term meriting a page. It would have to fit the notability guidelines in Wikipedia, such as appearing frequently in print, being listed on site like Allmusic.com, being described, etc. I myself have never heard the term, or any talk about "post-alternative" music. In addition, many critics are currently talking about a resurgence in alternative rock. If you're talking about popular music being affected by the breakthrough of alternative rock, then you should check out post-grunge. WesleyDodds 02:20, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

I started a rough draft page for Post Alternative Rock. User:Tigerghost/Post-Alternative Rock. It is in need of sources before it actually becomes a page though. And also it would be nice if this does become an article because it could finally find a home for the punk pop and Rock pop articles. Many don't believe that Punk-pop and Rock-Pop fit the criteria for the Rock or Punk genres, so this might ease the conflict between them. And to the responses of WesleyDodds, I really like Alternative Rock and Post-Alternative Rock. I don't think that Post-Alternative has the same feel as Alt-Rock of the '90s. That is why I think Post-Alt should be a sub-category of Alt-Rock...not a death point for it. But I do agree, I must have solid evidence before creating a page. I have also added indie-rock as a sub-genre. (Tigerghost 09:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC))

While the effort you wish to put into this is certainly commendable, this would most likely fail to adhere to Wikipedia:No original research. This sort of idea would be more suited to an editorial or an article in a magazine or website rather than a page on Wikipedia. And that's even before some of the questionable points in your reasoning about "post-alternative rock" are addressed (Ryan Cabrera? Glam metal?????). WesleyDodds 10:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
No. Post-Alternative Rock echoes Glam Metal. It isn't considered it. An echo is never the same as its source, similar, not the same. The point is that Alt-Rock from this decade is still considered Alt-Rock. Alt-Rock from the '90s sounds very different from Alt-Rock from the '00s. It is too broad is the point i'm getting at. They don't have to call it Post-Alt. All they need is to clarify better between '90s Alt Rock and '00s Alt Rock. 00's Alt Rock needs to a have a more universally excepted name like Grunge was. Rock pop is not the basic idea though because back in the late '90s, Alt-Rock was Rock Pop.(Tigerghost 12:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC))
The thing is alternative rock by its nature is broad. It's just pretty much with Nirvana and Smashing Pumpkins and others during the 90s it got a reputation in the public eye for primarily being music with loud, distorted guitars, ironic lyrics, and tons of angst. Pretty much what defined alt-rock during the 80s (when it was also called College rock and indie) was that it was music that developed as a result of punk rock in the indie scene that was restricted to the underground. Sonic Youth, The Replacements, The Smiths, Kate Bush, Half-Japanese, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Cocteau Twins and hundereds more could sound and did sound completely different from one another and still were alternative rock. And a lot of popular alt-rock right now (Modest Mouse, Franz Ferdinand, etc.) still has noticable ties to alt-rock before it. WesleyDodds 23:23, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ancestors ?

Maybe this article could include some more information on the precursors of underground and alternative music. While it did represent a clear break from everything else that was going on in the seventies, alternative music owes a lot to 60s underground music such as The Velvet Underground, the 13th Floor Elevators, Iggy Pop, Love (RIP Arthur Lee, aug. 2006) and Syd Barrett (RIP July 2006). ­74.56.146.147 11:15, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Bububu

Thought about it, but it would be kind of hard to write about them since they're not all influential over a huge swath of alt-rock (sure Sonic Youth and the Sisters of Mercy pray at the altar of Iggy, but it's certainly not universal) and many are a step removed from being direct influences on the genre (that extra step being punk rock). Unless they influnece particular periods or subgenres (like with the VU mention regarding the Paisley Underground) mentioning these artists can get a bit esoteric. WesleyDodds 11:22, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Should Be Split Back to Alternative Music With Its Own Page

Until Nirvana broke, alternative included everything from cowpunk to psychedelia to (some) dance music. What many are calling "British New Wave" of the mid-1980s - New Order, The Cure, XTC, were - at that time - initially called "New Music," or "Cutting Edge" (after the MTV show hosted by Peter Zaremba). "Alternative" came around 1986 or so, when radio trade publications finally settled on a name for the format. The harder bands that many seem to think define "alternative," were merely one spoke on a huge wheel.

Not all "New Music" (which was basically everything you could find on MTV early on) is what would now be classified as alternative. This article's about a genre, rather than a term. WesleyDodds 23:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
The bands that were making New Music in the early 1980s and were still continuing their careers would be classified as alternative by anyone who was a part of the alternative scene from 1986-1993. --FemmyV 20:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Several musicians who were not alternative were mislabelled as such. I've addressed this problem in the article so that such mislabelling is pointing out as such to the reader. -- LGagnon 00:35, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Great addition you made, although maybe it's just me, but I've never heard Hanson referred to as alternative. Maybe Hootie & the blowfish would be a better example . . .? WesleyDodds 00:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Hootie was never accepted as alternative in the first place. Same for Hansen. Bands such as Living Colour (mentioned in the article), Tracy Chapman, Arrested Development, Digable Planets, etc, got lumped under the alternative umbrella because they were adopted by alternative music fans. --FemmyV 20:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

And just for everyone's information, here's what Simon Reynolds' book on post-punk Rip it Up and Start Again says about "New Music":

"Punk and New Wave had fared badly in the United States in large part because of conservative radio programming, too. From the start, MTV focused on what the industry called New Music. Roughly equivalent to New Pop but slightly more expansive, the category also included New Wave artists such as Elvis Costello, the Psychedelic Furs, and the Pretenders."

So that pretty much has nothing to do with alternative rock. WesleyDodds 00:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

There's nothing in that quote that disproves the connection betwen Mew Music/New Wave and alternative music, of which alternative rock is but one segment.
From the Trouser Press Record Guides, considered the bibles of alternative music.
Second edition (1985) cover: An idiosyncratic review of the most exciting modern music - new wave to no wave, hardcore to hip-hop
From the Preface: By the time the book was first published in 1983, it was necessary to note that "new wave" had already lost most of its significance as a musical description. ... But what could replace it as an umbrella covering all those bands - from rockabilly to computer-driven - who had strolled through the door kicked down by the Clash, the Sex Pistols, Ramones and their contemporaries?
Robbins went on to conclude that no term was around that could apply.
"Fourth edition (1991) cover: The Ultimate Guide to Alternative Music
From the Preface: This book began as an almost successful attempt to review all of the significant albums with a direct connection to new wave music - records that either directly led to or resulted from the 1976-1977 upheaval spearheaded by the Clash, the Sex Pistols, Ramones, Television, Blondie, etc (Although it came to be - and remains - a derisive designation for watered-down bands who affected hip style but were bland enough for American pop radio, "new wave" was originally a general and non-judgemental description of bands upsetting the norm in the late '70s.)
... While dance music has, in the past, fallen outside of the stylistic framework of this book, there's no getting around it's current dominance* - so much more so now than during the disco era - of the pop life. In light of the Manchester rave scene, the rise of DJ/performers, industrial music and, of course, hip-hop, the '80s proved that rock 'n' roll and dance music can't escape each other.
  • At the time the 1991 edition came out, there had also been a huge alternative dance scene, for some years, in clubs that would book bands like RHCP, Miracle Legion, Scruffy, etc. and have DJs on off-nights.
Finally, from the Fifth Edition (1997). Subtitled 90s Rock (very telling)
From the Preface: The publication of this book's fourth edition at the end of 1991 was precipitously if not propitiously timed. The exploding success of Nirvana's Nevermind made "alternative music" a household term and attracted an enormous audience to music once thought to be permanently outside the putative mainstream.
... Furthermore, the connection of this decade's developments to the music that first kicked down some of the corporate business barricades and opened the DIY doors for business led to the inevitable conclusion that the '90s were shaping up as a clear and distinct era, with Nevermind conveniently serving as the inaugural message of Lollapaloozalot.
Alternative Music had everything to do with creating an audience and a ready-made market for Alternative Rock. If alternative music fans hadn't accepted Jane's Addiction, there wouldn't have been a door for Nirvana to kick in. By eliminating an Alternative Music page in favor of an Alternative Rock page, you're saying that one movement that was part of a wide genre (most Alternative fans in the mid-80s through early '90s resisted the wide use of subcategories) became the genre, itself. --FemmyV 20:20, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I think you're confusing a format commonly referred to as "alternative music" (better known as modern rock) with a specific genre. The genre known as alternative used to be called "college rock" in the US and "indie" in the UK during the 80s; alternative/modern rock radio was the most receptive radio format to the music as the 80s wore on. And as far as I've seen when talking about a genre, "alternative rock" and "alternative music" have been largely interchangeable. WesleyDodds 23:28, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Another thing: there's a few encyclopedias of alternative music out that while are very useful for individual biogrpahical information, really stretch the boundaries of the term in the genre sense, often including the Velvet Underground, David Bowie, Roxy Music, Big Star, punk, and any music considered "left of center". Past attempts to chronicle the history of alternative rock have tried to construct a history of the genre without noticing two things: one, the genre's immediate roots are a result of the enviroment created in the aftermath of punk, post-punk, and hardcore; and two, alternative rock often references music from the past, including the Velvet Underground. I mean, look at all the revival movements: jangle pop, Paisley Underground, the entire Creation Records roster (set up with the philosophy of mixing psychedelia with punk rock), the garage rock revival, Britpop, post-punk revival, etc. Reynold's afterword in his book is primarily devoted to pointing this out, in contrast to the "futurism" of post-punk and New Pop. As he says "'Alternative' defines itself as pop's other" so a lot of what goes on in the genre (such as R.E.M.'s murky folk-isms and grunge's deconstructed metal) are oppositions to what's going on, usually by recalling old sounds and recontextualizing them. WesleyDodds 23:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

You have brought up some interesting points, though. I think the distinction that must be made isn't between "alternative rock" and "alternative music" (especially considering a lot of people simply say "alternative") but between the word and what it is describing. One thing I've personally wondered for a while is where the term "alternative" in regards to music came from and when it was coined; the earliest references I've personally seen are no older than 1989. If you have the sources, we could add an etymology section to the article, like Punk rock and Heavy metal music have. WesleyDodds 00:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

You might find this interview with the founder of Alternative Press (music magazine) interesting. Usenet can be a mine ...

[edit] The term "alternative rock"

I'm going to add a section about the use of the term "alternative" as well as the other names the genre has been known by (college rock, indie, etc.) and the reluctancy of artists to use the label. My question is where should I place it: before the Overview, after the Overview, or as a subsection of the Overview? WesleyDodds 02:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

An etymology section would be best before the overview. -- LGagnon 02:56, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I hope that section now settles questions about the use of the term and what exactly the genre applies to. WesleyDodds 09:02, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Good work on this section. A brief reread of the article as a whole shows that this section has created some redundancies in other sections. 69.114.117.103 16:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC) (Ed Kollin)
Yeah, I'm removing them bit by bit (everytime I edit I think I've got them all and it's "Oops, there's another"). WesleyDodds 22:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Yep it is difficult. Unlike punk which arrived overnight the transformation form post punk/new wave to alternative was so gradual that only by looking back from 2006 can you see it happening. By the way last night VH1 Classics "The Alternative" played Romeo Void's "Never Say Never" 69.114.117.103 14:24, 5 October 2006 (UTC) (Ed Kollin)
They also play The Clash and The Jam. Love both bands, by the way. That's why it's good not to rely on programming (radio or TV) to determine the scope of a genre. After all, their goal is to play whatever certain people want, not to categorize and analyze the music. They help from a reference point of view, but mainly for context, not outright definition. Spending a few hours the other week looking at radio websites' histories and essays on the alternative/"modern rock"/"New rock" (there was a station site that actually argued that all music played on modern rock stations is called "new rock" now, and is all the same genre) they play found while searching for info through Google was kind of depressing from the viewpoint of this recently-graduated history minor.
The shift to alternative should probably be worked in to a broader scope in the Overview. Like you said, alt-rock came about gradually. Some early alternative bands like R.E.M., the Smiths, and Bauhaus emerged pretty fully-formed, but many others like Husker Du, the Replacements, The Cure, the Banshees, Meat Puppets, New Order, X, and so forth were punk, post-punk, hardcore, or New Wave before they changed their styles. A recurring theme I have found among all these bands in my reading is dissatisfaction with the limits of punk and trying to expand beyond them. But it's pretty hard to say at any point "alternative rock started here". It's still too amorphous a genre, compared to other types of rock like punk and heavy metal. WesleyDodds 00:32, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Alt becoming pop rock

Many alternative bands have become pop rock bands. This has disgraced the genre.

Some would argue that this has been happening since R.E.M. and the Smiths. WesleyDodds 02:03, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] limited popularity?

the infobox claims that the genre only experiences limited popularity, while almost all of todays' mainstream rock bands are or could be described as "alternative" (look into green, afi, blink 182, bands like that). thus, alternative rock is tremendously popular. how do we define the genre so that it is only marginally popular? 67.172.61.222 19:55, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm trying to think of better ways to rephrase it, but even with alt-rock's popularity there have still been numerous bands working on an underground level. WesleyDodds 23:03, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
the term "alternative" is almost all-encompasing, though, almost no modern rock band could not be considered alternative. it is very popular and just because there are a lot of underground bands doesn't diminish that. even the article itself says that the term is used to describe mainstream rock in the new millenium. 67.172.61.222 03:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Er, no. For example, Linkin Park, The Darkness, and blink-182 aren't alternative rock bands, just to name three random examples that appear on modern rock radio. Right now it certainly has a mainstream presence, but it's not dominant like it was during the 90s. The article is saying that "alternative" has been used indiscriminately at times, not necessarily that everything belongs under the label. And for every band that breaks through there have been many more who remain underground, to the point where entire alt-rock subgenres have been underground or only gained exposure with a freak hit. WesleyDodds 07:05, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ambiguity of the term "alternative rock"

Does anybody else think we should include a section about the ambiguity of term today. I mean, you have bands as dissimilar as Coldplay and Nickelback being put under that umbrella. What are the stylistic characteristics of an "alternative" song? It's got to be one of the most confusing terms around.

It's always been ambiguous and amorphous. Back in the 80s bands as dissimilar as Sonic Youth and The Smiths were alternative. In the 90s bands as dissimilar as Blur, Nine Inch Nails, and Primus were. As the article currently says, there are no set guidelines to an alternative song. However, the subgenres are a little more defined (dspite what fans of particular bands might say, there are some common defineable traits that embody genres like grunge, goth, Britpop, shoegaze, etc.), so I've always found it easier to determine the boundaries of the genre by defining the subgenres. In the case of the two bands you mentioned, Nickelback is post-grunge and Coldplay grew out of the post-Britpop movement. WesleyDodds 12:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/l/t/Talk%7EAlternative_rock_6f20.html"