User talk:Alexbulg
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Anti-Polonism
Hello! Nice to meet you. Note that your edits in Anti-Polonism are very much controversial and lead to edit war. Alx-pl D 20:35, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
If your edits are supported by sources then it's fine, but remember to put them once in a while either in the article or in the talk page. I really appreciate all efforts to make the article well documented and NPOV and much of your work is in direction towards presenting another point of view (POV) which was not covered by the article and on which I pointed out recently on the talk page. Of course the topic is very controversial and you will have to watch your edits not to cross this rule. Alx-pl D 08:30, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
Hallo-I have nothing against entering information on far right fringe parties like NOP but Antisemitism in Poland would be more fitting place for such information then antipolonism. Your edits made the article dominated by information on such parties-and from what I have seen you entered the information elswhere as well.Another solution could be to ad a chapter after Modern Antipolonism about the misuse of the term by fringe parties such as NOP. I would be happy to work with you on such formulation that doesn't distract the article. --Molobo 02:27, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] History of the Jews in Poland
Alexbulg, before making reverts, please discuss them as I did explaining why NYT 1937 article is as fabrication. If you have any primary source estimating the number of Jewish casulties during the 1930s riots in Poland please quote them - NYT is not one of them. --Ttyre 15:49, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Read
The archive before engaging in edits. Antipolonism is in dictionary of National Library of Poland. If we start to enter every mention where it is and where it isn't it will be absurd. As to your personal views-I will stay with encyclopedia as it seems reliable source. --Molobo 13:33, 13 December 2005 (UTC) did on Historical Anti-Polonism, which was also a reality but no longer exists. Sorry but you should read the archive. For example there is a link to book on Poland printed just now which states "after reading this book every Pole would be shot out of contempt". Also an article from Gazeta Wyborcza (a well known right wing nationalist paper ;) ) that speaks about using antipolish propaganda in Russia. --Molobo 13:37, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
No you are not right. Antipolonism as a word definetly exist and is used outside right wing circles also. Your statement: "but that it is harder for Poles outside of intellectual circles (ie. journalism) to be objective on this matter." Is very biased, I certainly don't think nationality determines thinking, In fact such views would fall into antipolonism itself. During World War II when almost all of Polish society was the object of German genocidal policies, mass campaign of extermination was an integral part of the anti-Polonist agenda You are questioning the hostility of Nazi Germany towards Poles ? I am sorry but this is absurd. but a global Anti Polonist agenda, in accordance to the ideas of right wingers. I am not interested in their ideology. "It has, however, been studied in scholarly works by Polish, German, Russian and English researchers" which researchers? books? papers? politic sciences magazines? This looks like a void claim as long as no references are given. I asked you before to read the article and archive. Even in this vandalised version you will find link to scholary work on polonophobia in Russian Empire. Why removing the mentions I made to the term being used as rebuttal of valid historical criticism of Polish antisemitism like the massacre in Jedwabne? You answered yourself -edit massacre in Jedwabne if you are interested in that subject. Why did you remove the links to many scholar sources to studies on right wing Polish parties and and of the nationalistic defense made by said groups on assetyions of Ant-Semitism? There is an article on Antisemitism in Poland-as I said before its fitting for this information. Image of yourself you're presenting is that you're a supporter of NOP of other alike party. Please study the history of the article-I was the first to enter the information that the term is misused by extremist circles. Your claims however that Poles think differently just because of their ethnic background don't support your neutrality on the issue of antipolonism. --Molobo 14:05, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
What the hell do you talk about ? Please stop from such insulting comments in the future. All your insults will be removed from my talk page. If you think that any research into relations between communists, Poles, and Jews means being antisemitic you are very biased. --Molobo 14:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)
Stop thinking that users other then you are part of some conspiracy of militia.I would also like to stop presenting the view that Poles are determined by their nationality to a line of thinking.As to the quote-if somebody claims a nation is from birth full of negative threats and must be "cleansed" its a simple racism. --Molobo 17:26, 13 December 2005 (UTC)MoloboYou ought to know.
[edit] Partitions of Poland
Would you take a look at talk:Partitions of Poland#Discussion. We are discussing a possible change of the name of the article there and I believe that a view from non-Polish perspective would be helpful. --Wojsyl (talk) 20:57, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
