User talk:Aleron235
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Leave a message for me here, I'll get back to you shortly.
Hey there! Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like this place--I sure do--and want to stay. If you need help on how to title new articles check out Wikipedia:Naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. If you need help look at Wikipedia:Help and The FAQ , plus if you can't find your answer there, check The Village pump or The Reference Desk! Happy wiki-ing! Alexandros
Contents |
[edit] Re Jelle Taeke de Boer
At that moment it makes no claim the he is notable. If you can provide such a claim, feel free to remove the speedy tag. I would do it quickly though, you never know when an admin will get around to looking at the speedy deletion category. --GraemeL (talk) 18:54, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Brian Peppers
Understanding that the article is undergoing edits by you. You wish to include the following link: [1]. It shows a photograph of the man. Thanks, --Kilo-Lima 22:12, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Andrew Kahr
Hi, you suggested clean up on Andrew Kahr. In what way does the article not reach the minimum level of quality needed by Wikipedia? Thanks in advance. User:killerdark
-- I have to admit I followed the links on your user page to figure out what to fix... Thanks.
And now it even starts to look like a normal Wiki page. I will continue to keep an eye on the Andrew Kahr page, to see how to create the right wiki looks.
[edit] Laffy Taffy (song)
The plural of innuendo is innuendi or innuendos or innuendoes, all are acceptable. Cchan199206 01:47, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Careful trimming of Notable books
Thanks for all your effort trimming the list notable books, but I noticed that you removed a few that were not actually covered by wikipedia or had very little coverage. In general, err to the side of caution before removing the topic because the ultimate goal of this project is expanding coverage, not just pruning the lists, though lots of pruning needs to be done. Removing all of the blue links on a list is usually a VERY BAD IDEA. Some of the articles like The Masquerader, The Net, The Passion, The Other actually covered the movie and not the book. There were other books like The Periodic Table or The Peter Principle that redirect to another completely different idea. This does not include articles that include coverage about the film and the movie like The Postman Always Rings Twice which barely touches on the book, like when it was released, any awards that it might have gotten. Please correct me if I'm wrong, because I did not check on all of the items that you removed but please check to see that the link actually corresponds to what the item is. See the guidelines at the main Missing articles page. By the way, I made the same mistake when I started working on this project, which is why I'm particularly watching for it. Thanks again for trimming the list but please do be more careful. --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 15:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re: My Chemical Romance
And I did cite a source. If that means you should stop removing the information, you little vandal. Alex 101 22:36, 16 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Miyeegombo Enkhbold
Hi, you were interested in the (N)POV status of the Tsakhiagiyn Elbegdorj article. His political opponent now got similarly treated under the opposite sign. Care to comment? --Latebird 23:01, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Elbegdorj
Thanks. I haven't done such a major cleanup on an existing article recently. We should probably both patrol the articles on these Mongolian politicians for a while to make sure that the POV is not added back in. Academic Challenger 03:20, 25 February 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia_talk:Censorship
A revised version of the proposed policy against censorship is now open for voting. Will you kindly review the policy and make your opinions known? Thank you very much. Loom91 11:14, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Image:Billy mays.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Billy mays.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
- On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --– Quadell (talk) (random) 19:37, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
