User talk:Alberto msr
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] "Global Djs", "Global Playboys"
Please do not create redirect pages to nonexistent articles. Once the target article exists, then create the redirect. Owen× ☎ 19:06, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Global Deejays
Can you give me a link to the article? The article called Global Deejays doesn't appear to have ever existed. Please respond on my talk page, and... Welcome!
Hello Alberto msr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Phroziac . o º O (mmm chicken) 23:18, 26 November 2005 (UTC)
- Ok. If i undelete that, it'll probably get deleted pretty quickly anyway. It was deleted because it's almost empty and has no information that would lead you to believe they are notable enough for Wikipedia to have an article about them. Looks like a vanity page. And it's almost empty, so there really isn't much to work with. It says "
Global deejays are 3 Dj's who remix commonly known dance songs. their first hit was 'San Francisco' other mixes include Flashdance, what a feeling. YMCA. Dont stop. American pie and many more.". If you wrote a new copy of it, that's slightly longer, and tells why they matter, then it will not be deleted. --Phroziac . o º O (mmm chicken) 01:00, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
-
- You're very welcome. And that's interesting, I've never even heard of them! --Phroziac . o º O (mmm chicken) 01:57, 27 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/11 12 2005 anal sex article - explicit draw
Hi there. I've reviewed the Mediation Cabal case indicated above and have concluded that, as far as I can see, it's a minor misunderstanding which didn't need to come to mediation at all, and seems to be being resolved even now. Please review the comments I placed on that page. Thanks. 86.133.53.111 05:39, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
