User talk:Aksi great
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] About Ankit Fadia page edit
It's sad to see, public knowledge bank, like wiki are being moderated by Prejudiced guys, who have no respect hacker or hacker culture. Please mail me at prabhat.linux@gmail.comfor any clarifications.
Sandy.
[edit] Cannot accept group posts as reliable sources ???
Who cannot accept ? You or Wikipedia ? You must understand Wikipedia itself is a group ware. It's illogical, if wikipedia, doesn't accept the posts from other groups. You must also understand, entire internet is built by public groups and it's members, generally hackers. Are you part of any group? If no, please join [LUG-Indore] and see no one can tell a lie or discuss nonsense in a well moderated group like us. Anyone in any public group is more responsible, when the say something, and they have to stand by their words, come what may, there in no escape. More over if you would have checked the link provided by me [Ankit Fadia : The real picture], you can find some the biggest names in Indian Hacker Club, people from Free Software Foundation of India, Indian hangout for hackers. If you say, these guys are not responsible enough to what they say, I am sorry to say, you really don't understand the meaning of reliability.
Sandy.
There is nothing wrong with others. It's all wrong with Indian Wikipedia Administrators who have been given rights to modify contents for well purpose of wikipedia. But so sad that though a lot of evidence appears about ankit fadia on internet as well as on this same wikipedia page, you peoples are doing arguements to find reasons. I saw various edits from all you three admins and sent a mail to HO Wikipedia with the contents that you reported to be wrong. You want to know who is using this IP? They are all the members of all kalpesh sharma group sharing single IP. Do what you can, do this protest will not stop ? Because peoples of country are being saved. nothing is being done wrong by saying the fact and truth about ankit fadia. You are all three discussing and finding about various reasons to anyway edit ankit fadia contents to what it was and don't want peoples to see the right thing. This is a challenge that if you find any content edited in ankit fadia wiki which is wrong, then come out and debate ?
Wikipedia is a reputed name for reputed peoples. Not for Ankit Fadia. If one or two or three articles were wrongly edited, we all might have not edited so many pages. but you are trying to specify that all the content edited about ankit fadia is wrong. Only you peoples are right ? All others are wrong is that what you mean. Then accept our challenge.
one more thing utcarsch, if you think what you mentioned above is right then you are wrong. Mr. Kalpesh always goes with evidence and proofs and that too right in front of eyes instead of barking on wikipedia like ankit fadia's article. As concerns to reputation how can you claim that this editing on wikipedia is because of media publicity. The pages on wikipedia have been edited by our group only from last 15 20 days, whereas ankit fadia's reputation is on net in the first thirty searches of google. First clear your concept and then speak. Go and view the logs of all the pages and urls that are posted in the article written on gather.com by kalpesh sharma itself.
[edit] PMO
Thanks for noticing it had been vandalized and shouldn't be deleted; I'd missed that. Akihabara 16:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Boredom
Is an exceptional motivator! Good compilation. -- Samir धर्म 08:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
