From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
Template:Air is part of WikiProject Anime and manga, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of anime and manga. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page.
|
Template |
This is a template and is not rated on the assessment scale. |
Looking to help? Check out the Anime and manga To-do:
Articles tagged for cleanup: Chou Kuse ni Narisou, Gungrave, Majokko Megu-chan, Sgt. Frog, Spriggan (manga), Sorcerous Stabber Orphen, Rose of Versailles.
Articles that have been tagged to be wikified: 4Kids Entertainment, Alexandria Meat, Astonaige Medoz, Ayakashi Ayashi, Azmaria Hendric, Des Blood 2, Gantz Targets, Hell Teacher Nūbē, Hikaru Kawamura, Jelly Jiggler, JoJo's Bizarre Adventure, Juvenile Orion, Komik Remaja, Light-Hawk Wings, Mirage of Blaze, PoPoLoCrois, Pummelo Island, Reiko the Zombie Shop, Robot School's Seven Mysteries, Shaman King: Soul Fight, The Black Organization 10 Hundred Million Yen Robbery Case, Theoretical digital lifeforms (digimon), Yumeria
Articles requested to be created: Anime and Manga | Mangaka | Seiyū.
Articles that need Animanga infoboxes: Hiyoko brand | Jazz (yaoi)
Articles requested to be expanded: Stubs..., Expand section...
List of articles to be... Merged
|
[edit] whoa, 3 templates??
ok, these 3 templates need to become one.. I haven't been able to find any guidelines on nav templates, but this is... just.... there's no reason to split this into three templates.. -- Ned Scott 05:01, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
- There are no guidelines for nav templates nor should guidelines determine how templates supposed to apear. 3 templates is necesary. There are very good reasons to split them into 3. Articles talking about series dont need links to individual characters especialy if the chanaracters never appear in the show.
- It is easy to present information in a cramed way. When I design templates and tables I consider very low and high resolutions, as well as situations where the template might get distorted.
- --Cat out 14:17, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
- On a second thought, I can merge them with little comprimise from syntax. --Cat out 18:53, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
What do you think about this template ? It's more concise and has all the necessary links. Taw 23:45, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
Can't you all find something more constructive to argue about than something as paltry and menial as a template? - Mark 05:01, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
- Uh, incase you haven't noticed, we came to an agreement on this.. you're a bit late to the party. -- Ned Scott 05:16, 27 June 2006 (UTC)