Talk:Act of War: High Treason

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Act of War: High Treason article.

Famicom style controller This article is part of WikiProject Computer and video games, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
Low This article is on a subject of low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0.

Contents

[edit] New Thread

AOW : HT is releasing soon. Once it is released we have to create this article.

SkyWalker 16:45, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Help

I have added this article. If u have any further information about this game please be free to add. If there are spell mistakes please correct. Let me know.

Thanks SkyWalker 07:08, 18 March 2006 (UTC)

- Roger that. Wilco, I'll add to this one as soon as I can. EDIT: Ok, added info on the scud mode, feel free to go over it. Will try to do the factions soon. (also, need more info on naval.) gg

- Looks good. Thanks for helping . Please be free to add a lot more.

SkyWalker 15:53, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

I have added some more things. Due to lack of information iam unable to add factions,Skirmish(Engagement),MultiPlayer. If anyone has got any information please add and do the changes necessary SkyWalker 17:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

I said I'd help, but been busy with school, and easter is just around the corner. I should be able to add alot more then. GMT+1 10:20, 7 April 2006

Ok, I did all units/changes/upgrades for the US side. Feel free to go over and possibly organize it. (I'm new to how this wikipedia editing stuff works.) Also, since the faction descriptions on the DA page provide a bit more backround info, perhaps a link to that page should be put up? (By the way, I used the manual and took info from there. I didn't really see it fitting to write about the factions in the same style I did for the DA page. This is an expansion after all.)

To whoever changed the "new units" thing for the US, the MLRS, and the Thunderbolt is not new units. But they have been altered.

Understood. I will make the changes tomorrow. I will add upgrade seprately SkyWalker 15:53, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Question

Is AoW: HT an expansion pack or a stand-alone game? Direct2Drive is selling it for $40 as a standalone, which is different from everything I've heard elsewhere. --BMS 03:43, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

The D2D version of the game is completely stand-alone.

I think its stand alone. The game has its own directories and files. They are not merged with the main game like normal expansion packs do.

The D2D version is Stand - alone. The Boxed version (Act of War:High Treason) you need Act of War: Direct Action to play. Hope noone is confused now. --SkyWalker 17:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] This game is avaliable in US.

You can buy this game(Act of War: High Treason)from here :=

1.Circuit City

2.J&R Music and Computer World

3.Amazon Site

4.Best Buy

Enjoy,

Happy Gaming

--SkyWalker 15:21, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks alot, SkyWalker. I've been looking for this game since it supposedly came out. This is the first I've found of it offline in the States.

-Fluke

[edit] Screenshots

We need more screenshots.--Taida 00:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Which screenshots to add? --SkyWalker 16:10, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't know, I've never played this game.--Taida 17:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Command and Conquer: Generals

What I don't understand is how no one critisizes the fact that both this game and the first one look like a direct copy of Command and Conquer: Generals. The first article mentions that it's based off of this but it looks so completely similar, just a little better (and was created 2 years after Generals). Since it looks a ton better than Generals (in terms of graphics and concept), to me, it should just be called Command and Conquer: Generals 2.

This game has nothing got to with generals. --SkyWalker 12:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I know it has nothing to do with Generals... different company, different... a lot of things. I didn't literally mean they should make the name C&C: Generals 2.
It does look very similar to Generals--Taida 17:55, 2 August 2006 (UTC)