User talk:Ace Class Shadow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archives
February 12th to August 1, 2006 (with edit history) August 4 to November 9, 2006 November 9 to November 24, 2006

Welcome.

This is a Wikipedia user talk page, not an encyclopedic article.

Click on the plus sign at the top of the screen to leave a new message. I think you can handle it from there. (This message brought to you by "Wikipedia for dummies".) ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 20:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Mediation request 2 Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishing for pike (2nd nomination) 3 man of the year 4 I'm a bit confused. 5 Late Night 6 ep count for Peter Petrelli 7 Ant-Man 8 Request for Mediation 9 In brightest day, in blackest night 10 SuperBowl? 11 some deletes 12 Batman Begins 13 Boggyling the mind 13.1 hi 1 13.2 hi 2 14 Stranger than Fiction, last names 15 Hero edits 16 Spidey 17 Comments on TV-NC 18 "Jessica" vandalism

[edit] Mediation request

A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television), and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Wikipedia:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fishing for pike (2nd nomination)

I came across this Afd you started. Please remember that AfD is for deletions only. If you want something transwikied, please follow the instrunctions at Wikipedia:Transwiki. - Mgm|^(talk) 11:32, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

I wanted it deleted. Geees... Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 18:56, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] man of the year

stern stated on his show today he was offerd the part—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Elliott golding (talk • contribs) on 03:01, November 30, 2006 (UTC); Please sign your posts!

That's nice. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 03:03, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] I'm a bit confused.

You have removed the reference to Hartlepool's monkey mayor from the discussion page of the Man of the Year (2006 film) article, and declared this reference "nonsense." Have you misunderstood something? It's a reference to the famous (in England) case of a football mascot winning a popular vote - which I mentioned as an interesting parallel to the film Man of the Year, in which this happens:

"When an offhand remark he makes prompts 6 million people to email their support, Dobbs decides to campaign for President. To nearly everyone's surprise, he is declared winner of the election."

What bit of this is nonsense? I'm just curious.

81.130.215.14

You weren't clear. Work on that. Oh...and sign your comments with four tildes. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 20:25, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Apology accepted. Thank you. 81.130.215.14 20:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

It wasn't an apology. And your addition still isn't appropriate. Learn how to edit where. Talk page comments should always be signed. Also, the whole "unlikely candidate wins" thing is common now. I remember Eddie Murphy was in a movie with that as theme. Anyway, thanks but no thanks. Don't add unsigned "see also" sections to talk pages, (especially archived ones,) and don't add it to the actual article, either. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 21:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, it's not that easy getting the hang of Wikipedia conventions. I was only just trying to help out by pointing people at a piece of information that I thought was interesting and relevant to the matter in hand: "unlikely candidate wins". Because it was slightly more relevant than that, I thought, but never mind. I was interested to know about the Eddie Murphy movie you mention. There may be an interesting connection to be made (?) but I don't know where I would go about making it. Any advice? thanks 81.130.215.14 16:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Late Night

No, they're not the "exact" same show, but several things are the same between them. The show name "Late Night", the timeslot 12:35 following "The Tonight Show" and it's in the same studio. Not merging them would be the same as tearing apart "The Tonight Show" article for each host because they all haven't done the same bits and acts. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ernde38 (talk • contribs) on 18:28, December 1, 2006 (UTC); Please sign your posts!

[edit] ep count for Peter Petrelli

By my reckoning he has been in every episode, and thats 10 so far... I am confused as to why you changed it from 9 to 7? WookMuff 20:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

"Your count"'s wrong and I've compromised to eight. I believe a user was going through articles, "boosting" counts based on Tonight's new episode and its preview. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 20:05, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Six months ago was episode 10, and has peter not been in every episode up to and including that? Seriously, where are you getting your figures? WookMuff 20:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ant-Man

I have a question about a comic book character. I wanted to merge Magneto (film) into Magneto (comics) as there's really no news about any kind of development. I planned to do the same with Ant-Man (film), which was announced at Comic-Con with not very many details, but there's no actual Ant-Man (comics), just a redirect to a so-called disambiguation page that doesn't seem like it needs to be like that. Shouldn't the page at least summarize each Ant-Man incarnation and link to the main articles (Henry Pym, Scott Lang, etc.), and that would allow room for an Adaptation section (with a Film subsection) to merge the Ant-Man film information into? Let me know your thoughts. --Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 03:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Request for Mediation

A Request for Mediation to which you are a party was not accepted and has been delisted. You can find more information on the mediation subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Wikipedia:Naming conventions (television). For the Mediation Committee, Essjay (Talk) This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management. If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

[edit] In brightest day, in blackest night

Green Lantern Movie: 2008 has been nominated as an article for deletion. Please go to the AfD page to vote for deletion. --Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 18:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Isn't that like...cheating? Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 19:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

I think it would only apply if someone like this article's creator tried to get other people to vote to keep or tried to create sockpuppets to vote the same way. You and the others are all independent editors with histories (especially superhero-based) that predate this nomination, and this was a pretty clear-cut case. It'd be kind of boneheaded if the nomination failed just because I tapped like-minded folks for their preference. Hell, I think that's how Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Full Moon Fever (film) got no census even though the sole two citations were from frickin' 2004. (I've merged it since.) --Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 20:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SuperBowl?

Why did u delete the paragraph I created about C.M airing after the SuperBowl? In the TV indusrty, that's a HUGE deal, not something that goes unnoticed. Many shows that have aired post-SUPERBOWL garner HUGE ratings! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yrgh (talk • contribs) 19:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC).

Shows that air after the SUPERBOWL (SB) have been known to increase their audience by at least 50% in viewers. That's a large increase if you ask me. Many producers hope that their shows air after the BOWL. X-Files highest reated ep was 23 million (aired after SB); Family Guy got about 20 million (aired after SB); The Practice got 23.1 (aired after SB). MANY shows highest rated ep was b/c of their post-SB time slot.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yrgh (talk • contribs) on 20:11, December 7, 2006 (UTC); Please sign your posts!

[edit] some deletes

Did you put delete tags on the spider-man 1995 live action show or soul squad (band) pages? I see the articles on wp:afd, but I don't see the things at the tops of the pages... Is this a necessary part of the afd process? I'm kind of new... I'm sorry if these are silly questions. -- Ben (talk) 03:20, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Batman Begins

Varengo71 is trying to expand on the information that you wrote in the Influences subsection. I'm pretty sure you covered everything that was mentioned in the featurette, but I wanted to make sure his so-called additions were really original research. If they are, do you mind going to his talk page (where I've already left a comment) and informing him that you had seen the featurette, which did not include this information? Just tell him if he wants to include it, he'd need to find another citation. —Erik (^talk/_contrib) @ 22:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

I contacted a couple of editors who had failed the FA nomination of Batman Begins a while ago, and one of them responded to my talk page at length. Just wanted to pass on the advice that he shared regarding further possible changes to the film article. You can find his comment here. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 00:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Boggyling the mind

[edit] hi 1

You seem smart on Spider man. Is captain america in this one. I think I say something last night on channle 9 in my state. Boggydark 00:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate the sentiment, and I'll look into it. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 00:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Will you help me edit Spider man3 article please. It needs it. Boggydark 02:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] hi 2

I read on another site sandman is killed by water. Is this in movie? Is this in comics? wat history exists here that can shed light on this mystery. Boggydark 19:47, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

You know, I wish I could help, but I'm not really a "hardcore fan". I'd recommend going to [1]. Don't worry about the 'pedia, we update quickly. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 20:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Stranger than Fiction, last names

I added the links to the last names because the characters are clearly all named after famous men of science, and I found that to be an interesting little fact, possibly useful for analysis of the film. If you check IMDB you will see that there is also a Dr. Mittag-Leffler and Dr. Cayly (sp). It's perhaps an observation more fit to be mentioned as "trivia", but it should be there, I feel. Should I start a trivia section perhaps? Thoughts?

A comment on reverts...Personally it doesn't phase me, but you should know that a lot people take reverts very personally, and I have been persuaded to feel that they should be used almost only in cases of vandalism, talking is always better, and if one feel that one must revert, one should always make a talk comment to the person. I made someone pretty sore a while back over this, and in the end I agree with them. jugander (t) 09:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hero edits

You keep reverting the change for the second sentence of the heroes' characters page.

It currently reads: The article details with the series' main, recurring and minor characters.

"The article details with the series" doesn't make sense grammatically. Why do you keep changing it back? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.161.73.100 (talk) 10:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC).

My mistake. I'll get on that. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 20:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Spidey

We really don't get no friggin' respect... and I can't believe he's quoting a forum... Someone give him a rattle. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 17:44, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Comments on TV-NC

Hey, Ace. I don't want to pull an Elonka on you, but you might want to cool the rhetoric at TV-NC a bit. The tone of some of your recent comments is a bit combative and condescending, and we don't want to give Elonka and Matthew any more ammunition. (I'm afraid Matthew has already cited your reply to Wikizach as evidence of "continued incivility".) Their case is a weak one, but we still shouldn't help them out. Let's leave the snide asides to Matthew, OK? Thanks, and I hope you understand. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 06:15, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Jessica" vandalism

You said:

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jessica. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Ace Class Shadow; My talk. 04:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I did not edit the Jessica article.

12.189.32.38 14:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)Joel