Abstract simplicial complex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, an abstract simplicial complex is a purely combinatorial description of the geometric notion of simplicial complex.
[edit] Definition and example
Given a universal set S, and a family K of finite nonempty subsets of S (that is, K is a subset of the power set of S), K is an abstract simplicial complex if the following is true:
- ∀ X ⊆ S, if X ∈ K, then ∀ Y ⊂ X it follows that Y ∈ K.
The elements of K are called abstract simplices. Furthermore, for X ∈ K, define the dimension to be dim(X) = |X| − 1, and consequently define dim(K) = max{dim(X), X ∈ K}. Note that the dimension of K might be infinite.
- Example. Let V be a finite subset of S of cardinality n+1 and let K be the power set of V. Then K is called a combinatorial n-simplex with vertices V. If V = S = {0, 1, 2, …, n}, K is called the standard combinatorial n-simplex.
One-dimensional simplicial complexes are (simple) graphs.
- K(d) = {X ∈ K, dim(X) ≤ d}
is the d-skeleton of K. In particular, the 1-skeleton is called the underlying graph. The union of all 0-dimensional simplices ∪ K0 is called the underlying vertex set of K.
K is said to be a finite simplicial complex if K is a finite family of sets. This is easily seen to be equivalent to requiring that the underlying vertex set be finite.
A simplicial map f: K → L is a function between the underlying sets ∪ K0 → ∪ L0, such that for any X ∈ K the image set f(K) is a simplex in L.
[edit] Geometric Realization
We can associate to an abstract simplicial complex K a topological space |K|, called its geometric realization, which is a simplicial complex. The construction goes as follows.
First let denote the category whose objects are the simplices in K and whose morphisms are inclusions. Next choose a total order on the underlying vertex set of K and define a functor F from to the category of topological spaces as follows. For any simplex X ∈ K of dimension n, let F(X) = Δn be the standard n-simplex. The partial order on the underlying vertex set of K then specifies a unique bijection between the elements of X and vertices of Δn, ordered in the usual way e0 < e1 < … < en. If Y ⊂ X is a subsimplex of dimension m < n, then this bijection specifies a unique m-dimensional face of Δn. Define F(Y) → F(X) to be the unique affine linear embedding of Δm as that distinguished face of Δn, such that the map on vertices is order preserving.
We can then define the geometric realization |K| as the colimit of the functor F. More specifically |K| is the quotient space of the disjoint union
by the equivalence relation which identifies a point y ∈ F(Y) with its image under the map F(Y) → F(X), for every inclusion Y ⊂ X.
If K is a finite simplicial complex, then we can describe |K| more simply. Choose an embedding of the underlying vertex set of K as an affinely independent subset of some Euclidean space RN of sufficiently high dimension N. Then any abstract simplex X ∈ K can be identified with the geometric simplex in RN spanned by the corresponding embedded vertices. Take |K| to be the union of all such simplices.
If K is the standard combinatorial n-simplex, then clearly |K| can be naturally identified with Δn.