Talk:A Whiter Shade of Pale
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Would anybody object to removing the comment "This song was also a favorite of Douglas Adams, author of the wildly popular "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" series."?
- Is it relevant? (A great many people consider it a favorite)
- Is it accurate? (there is no external reference).
- Is it important? (The Procol Harum Song "Grand Hotel", is at it inspired one of his books, but this one?)StormCloud 13:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Given that nobody has commented on this in a week, I'm going to remove these lines StormCloud 12:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Possible meaning?
The second paragraph of Lyrics is a theory I have been working on. A fuller version is at [1].
Perhaps this Discussion area is a good spot for a debate about the appropriateness of mentioning a specific theory of the meaning of the lyrics.
As a start, I acknowledge that a lot of Procol Harum lyrics seem to be abstract ie without specific reference. Salty Dog particularly seems to have emotional flow, but its evocation of a sea-journey may be felt as like many of our life-journeys, not specific to one. However Pilgrim's Progress is fairly specific about a particular spiritual journey: not its content, but its consequences. He hurt those dearest to him, and found himself simply a long way from home.
Those great works of art which effect most of us must be non-specific enough that we can feel the emotional events there as very like our own. But the power of art is often how accurately the work depicts a specific emotional event which happens to us all.
- I strongly feel that we should not include a section of possible meanings of the Lyrics. This is fine for the Fan web sites such as procolharum.com, but Wikipedia is suppose to be a accurate. Speculating isn't appropriate here.--StormCloud 15:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] YouTube links
This article is one of thousands on Wikipedia that have a link to YouTube in it. Based on the External links policy, most of these should probably be removed. I'm putting this message here, on this talk page, to request the regular editors take a look at the link and make sure it doesn't violate policy. In short: 1. 99% of the time YouTube should not be used as a source. 2. We must not link to material that violates someones copyright. If you are not sure if the link on this article should be removed, feel free to ask me on my talk page and I'll review it personally. Thanks. ---J.S (t|c) 07:16, 7 November 2006 (UTC)