Talk:A Day at the Races (album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is part of the Queen WikiProject, a WikiProject that aims to improve the coverage of Queen on Wikipedia.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High importance on the importance scale.
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.
Queen WikiProject To-Do edit - history - watch - purge Make Bohemian Rhapsody a "featured article." (See it's peer review.) Convert all album pages using the guidelines set out by the albums sub-project Merge all non-notable song pages into the album pages. (see Wikipedia:WikiProject Queen/songs for a list of notable songs) Make Queen (band) a featured article. Get the Queen WikiProject page done. Change all stubs to articles.

The Queen WikiProject needs your help! We are currently in the process of defining article and notability guidelines for albums and songs.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

The album box is just completely wrong Secretlondon 14:37, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Two Singles sections?

This entire article was a list of lists and charts and boxes. I have tried to make some of it into text. I do not think I have lost any vital information. I have tried to make UK and US releases distinct. Telsa 11:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] I marked that section as POV

• It sounds like a review. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheDavesr (talk • contribs) 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• I only saw one sentence in that section that was blatantly POV, and it looks like that has been removed since the template was added. This is not to say that this section is written well, and it could certainly use more references. But I think it's safe to remove the POV tag for now. -- H·G (^words/_works) 06:50, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

• Agreed. I looked over the section, and it's solidly NPOV now -- just totally uncited. Have retagged appropriately. -- Kaosfere 05:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)