Talk:A Day No Pigs Would Die

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the General Project Discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Article Grading:
The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article.

[edit] Content

This page is currently a pseudo-Cliffs Notes version of the books, and needs a massive revision. Deborah-jl Talk 07:03, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

(restoring content that was deleted. Pkazazes, unless you are archiving a lengthy talk page, please do not delete other people's messages from talk pages, even if you find them no longer relevant. Article content may be ruthlessly edited, but talk pages are archival, and should not be deleted. See Wikipedia:Avoiding common mistakes#Deleting.... Deborah-jl Talk 15:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC))

[edit] Stub

I have removed the "Child Book" stub, because there has been some controversy over whether this is a child or young adult book. I will leave the stub note however. Pkazazes 14:24, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

Currently there is no young adult stub, and most young adult books on wikipedia are categorised as children's for the purpose of stubs and categories. The in-the-process-of-forming children's lit WikiProject has this on the table for whether it's a good or bad idea to distinguish between the two, but for now, the Child-lit and Child-book stubs are the best way to make sure people looking at the appropriate stub pools will see the book. However, none of this prevents you from mentioning (and citing your sources for) the controversy in the article itself. Deborah-jl Talk 15:10, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Copyvio

Revisions since the revision of 13:31, 16 February 2006 have contained copyrighted material lifted from Spark Notes (see e.g [1]). I've reverted to an earlier version and removed the revisions containing copyvio material from the history. --Nick Boalch ?!? 15:06, 17 February 2006 (UTC)