Talk:A Charlie Brown Christmas

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A Wikipedian removed A Charlie Brown Christmas from the good article list. There are suggestions below for improving areas to satisfy the good article criteria. Once the objections are addressed, renominate the article as a good article. If you disagree with the objections, you can seek a review.

Removal date: 10 December 2006

Contents

[edit] Edits

I'm well aware of the edits made to this special to remove the Coca-Cola sponsorship. However, during the dancing at the rehearsal, there's an obvious jump (the music skips from the refrain partially into the first verse). What was there, and why was it edited?

  • I was watching it tonight and was reminded of how poor the editing was in places, so I would chalk it up to that. Wahkeenah 03:19, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

According to the book, "A Charlie Brown Christmas: The Making of a Tradition", Bill Melendez says that a year after the first airing of A Charlie Brown Christmas, they went back and fixed up a few of the scenes in the show that bothered them. Perhaps this explains the odd musical cut. 64.136.26.225, 09:04, 15 December 2005

  • If so, they didn't do very much to it. Wahkeenah 09:11, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

Light bulb turns on Aha! Perhaps this explains what I commented about over at "Talk:A Charlie Brown Christmas (album)" --Nerd42 00:09, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

  • I believe this was actually the second Peanuts TV special. I think the first was baseball-themed and came out the summer before the Christmas show aired. Not sure though. PurpleChez 30 June 2006

[edit] Trivia

The voice talent for Charlie Brown (Peter Robbins) had an on-screen role in the 1967 Sonny and Cher film Good Times. — Eoghanacht talk 18:38, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Possible add to "Trivia"

Wouldn't it be appropriate to add the overt mention of this special in the Buffy episode "The Replacement"? Snoopydance 17:15, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Reasons for delisting

Hi all,

I do not this meets the criteria for a good article because:

  • It has a short lead.
  • It has no inline citations.
  • It has a large trivia sections.
  • It has unaddressed tags.

If you disagree with this evaluation. Please feel free to renominate the article for promotion here.

Thanks, Cedars 16:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)