User talk:86.20.53.195

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. Martinp23 20:25, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

I wasn't meant to delete it, but since I'm a new user, I didn't know how to do it, so I just clicked on the save changes and got out of it as soon as possible. Please reinstate me.

Ah, I'm sorry, it's been ages since I was a new user so I forgot that the "back" button on a new user's browser automatically doesn't work. I'd also forgotten that, having saved a blanking of a page, that a new user's browser automatically adds to the page just edited.

Or perhaps this doesn't happen automatically? Perhaps you have another reason for these supernatural occurances? Personally, I'm all ears to hear of them. Do tell. ➨ ЯEDVERS 21:46, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] December 2006

Can I have a final warning?

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to User:TJ Spyke, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 17:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edit to WWE Bottom Line (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to World Wrestling Entertainment. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Fang Aili ^talk 17:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Misplaced warning

You were blocked some time ago (for vandalism). I put the warning there because I thought you had made a vandal edit, but then I realised I had got the wrong IP address, so I removed the warning message as you're not the right person. Hut 8.5 18:23, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RAW is Owen

• Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to RAW is Owen, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 18:16, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I wasn't vandalising it, I wanted to put a deletion tag on it, I don't know how to as it has been nominated before. Can you help me? 86.20.53.195 18:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Goto WP:AFD and this will answer all your questions, any further probs, don't hesitate to give me a shout. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 18:21, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Given that RAW is Owen has already been through AFD, why not discuss it's future on the appropriate talk page? User:Booshakla recently tried to move / merge the page without discussion, have you two met? In any case, you might like to register a username before making an AfD nomination. Deizio talk 18:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • I see you've left the anon IP a message, so thanks. From my part all I have seen is an anon IP with a light hiostory of vandalism, hence I reverted the blanking as it had no edit commentary. I'll keep an eye on the IP, if there's no further vandalism or gets involved in discussion as you suggest then I'll remove the warning. Thanks Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 18:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
    • I have written this on Khukri's page, and I'm writing it on yours, RAW is Owen is a normal RAW, except it's just special because of Owen. Last week's RAW won't be remembered for ever will it? 86.20.53.195 18:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
      • That's why the article was previously nominated, but there was no consensus to delete. If this goes back to AfD, I'll have to note in that discussion that there has been no material change in the article since it was last nominated, and the rationale for nominating is the same. That fact that you are editing from an IP with a history of blocks and warnings won't look great either. As the previous vote ended in "no consensus" I probably wouldn't personally go so far as to close a debate under Criteria #3 of speedy keep, but someone else might. There are a million more important issues to clean up in the cruft-ridden world or WWE coverage on Wikipedia. Deizio talk 18:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
        • Before we end up arguing, I was trying to find the Eddie Guerrero Tribute Show from last November on Wikipedia. It was on their in September. Now it's deleted. One rule doesn't apply for one tribute show compared to another tribute show. Also Tribute To The Troops has been nominated for deletion.86.20.53.195 18:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• There's no argument here, just procedure. I'm the administrator who closed the first deletion debate, and have not edited the content of the page. I don't care if it gets deleted in the way I would care if I dropped my keys down a drain. If you want to nominate it for deletion, go right ahead. I'm not really aware of the Guerrero tribute page, its fate or any impact that might have on this discussion. Like I said there are far more pressing maintenance issues in the WP coverage of WWE, but you are welcome to act as you see fit. I'm hanging up now. Oh, btw when you're having an active talk-page discussion it can be extremely frustrating when you edit the page while another editor is likely adding a comment, leading to edit conflicts. Deizio talk 19:00, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Someone's nominated Raw Owen for deletion. Just thought you wanted to know. 86.20.53.195 19:03, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Having looked through your actions, post my warning, as I said if you showed good faith then I would remove the warning, but your susbsequent actions mean I will not remove the warning and have put you on my watch list. Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 11:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Checkuser

From your contribution histories it appears that you (86.20.53.195) are also Davnel03. We can file an official request for checkuser to confirm this if you would like? Deizio talk 19:06, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

Well done for inserting the word "CUNT" on my userpage [1]. I've blocked you for 48 hours. Let's hope you can keep your cool when the block expires. Deizio talk 19:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)