User talk:86.128.222.36

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Insertion of illegitimate votes

Stop reinserting you and your sockpuppet's votes. - Conrad Devonshire 12:50, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

You have already been officially designated as a sockpuppetter by an administrator. If you are later proven not to be so (which is unlikely), then you and the other user can reinsert your votes. As of now, if you reinsert them again, I will report you. - Conrad Devonshire 13:02, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

No, Rennix has been designated as being a SUSPECTED sockpuppet. If that is not disproven by the time the vfd is closed then HIS vote will not count, but MINE still stands. Either way, it's up to the admin who closes the vfd to discount his vote, not you. 86.128.222.36 13:09, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

Well then, if User:Rennix is not a sockpuppet, then let him reinsert his own vote once he gets unblocked. As for your vote, I'm assuming that people who engage in sockpuppet voting have their votes disqualified, so until you are proven not to be a sockpuppetter I consider your vote disqualified. If you want to take this up with an administrator, be my guest. But until I hear from one about this, I am going to continue to remove your vote from the nomination. - Conrad Devonshire 13:52, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
What you consider is irrelevent. The closing admin will make his own mind up, and the votes will continue to be re-inserted until the vfd is closed. And even if I had used sockpuppets for additional votes, my original vote would still stand.86.128.222.36 13:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

I've blocked you for a week for sockpuppetry and tendentious and disruptive editing. Plese reconsider your conduct while you're waiting out your block. · Katefan0(scribble)/poll 17:54, 15 April 2006 (UTC)