User talk:83.67.4.89

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, can you please explain why you have been deleting links fromthe article Swaminarayan? They seem to have relevant content. Thanks, -Willmcw 19:53, Apr 9, 2005 (UTC)

Also Please fill in the summary field every time you save an edit. It helps other eidtors if you describe what you have done. See: Wikipedia:Edit summary, which is an official policy. Thanks. -Willmcw 22:47, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Joyous 23:12, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)


Please give us the source for the number of temples and centers maintained by Shree Swaminarayan Sampraday. I checked the website but couldn't find the info. In the meantime, I've removed the dipsuted number and replaced it with "many." Thanks -Willmcw 19:29, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
Please bring any major changes that you wish to make to Swaminarayan to the talk page so that other editors can review them. Your previous edits to that article have been so sharply POV that it is hard to receive your new edits in good faith without getting some explanation of what you are doing. Also, please do not delete information from the talk page. Thanks, -Willmcw 02:43, May 30, 2005 (UTC)

Once again, let me ask you to please bring your changes to the talk page. Wikipedia works on wikipedia:consensus. If you can convince the other editors of the merit of your edits then they can stand. But so far the discussion on the talk page has not supported your changes. That does not mean you can simply override the community. -Willmcw 21:59, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

If you participate in a discussion there is a fair chance that the other editors will "meet you halfway". If you simply impose an odd, POV version without talking about it then it will just be reverted quickly. In an ideal world, if we write the correctly NPOV version then it will make everyone happy and the article will be more stable. Let's make this an ideal world. Cheers, -Willmcw 07:26, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

I would suggest you to see more of wikipedia. --Bhadani 10:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. RexNL 23:10, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

Sorry if I removed some valid additions; a lot of your edits have not always been useful, so maybe I presumed. Batmanand | Talk 23:16, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Bhagwan Swaminarayan. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. — Brendenhull (T + C) at 11:29, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Bhagwan Swaminarayan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sfacets 00:09, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Bhagwan Swaminarayan, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sfacets 00:13, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bhagwan_Swaminarayan

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. (aeropagitica) 22:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: "my reason for unblocking is because I think my last edit was a valid one on the Swaminarayan page which has enough opinions from the editors and it has been discussed on the discussion page on not to be involved with BAPS because that is really a different Sampraday and why do you put baps on the Swaminarayan page they are another Sampraday from the Swaminarayan one with different believes and teachings? They are mentioned very few times to show there difference from the Swaminarayan Sampraday so please don’t go against what has been discussed"

Decline reason: "Sorry, do you mean that you want to be unblocked because, whilst all your edits have been detrimental, the last one that you were blocked for was not meant to be? So we're to await the next intentional detrimental edit you make and block for that one, yes? -- ➨ ЯEDVERS 19:45, 26 October 2006 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../8/3/2E/User_talk%7E83.67.4.89.html"