User talk:82.198.252.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] WP:3RR

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. AnnH ♫ 12:39, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I noticed you are known only as an IP address; that means you are not signed up. To sign up, you only need to click Create account and choose a username and password. You don't need to provide any personal information. If you sign up, you'll have a username that others can use to recognize you and leave you messages on the wiki. You'll be able to sign your name just by typing four tildes (~~~~) when you leave someone else a message. Plus, you (and others) will easily be able to see a list of all your contributions to Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, ask at the Village pump, or feel free to ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!


Please discuss your issues with the Roman Catholic Church article on it's talk page. I'm sure other editors will be happy to discuss the problems you see and some sort of agreement reached on how this should be handled. Sophia 12:41, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

I would ask you to read the WP:3RR policy that Ann mentions above as it is quite detailed and very important to the integrity of the encyclopedia. Currently, if you retore your preferred version again you will be in breach of this rule. If you require any help then please do ask. Sophia 12:48, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Totnes stuff

And I'll copy it to my talk page in case you don't get it (but why not set up a user and then we'll know the conversation will be ok!?). I've redone the KEVICS bit - sort of agree - sort of don't but that seems a compromise? I guess I see your edit over the other bit as better than it was. Comments more than welcome cheers --Nigel (Talk) 17:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Us Totnes folk have got to stick together you know <g>. (OK originally I was about 4 miles away but now...!). And I still say sign up - cheers --Nigel (Talk) 13:36, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
PS - which art shop has five figure prices - semi serious cos I'll take it out otherwise --Nigel (Talk) 13:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Roman Catholic Church

Dear Wiki User

I left the following message in the “user talk” page of Csernica and as expected from the zealots who edit the Roman Catholic Church entry have had no reply.

It seems to me one ought to set up a rival page with the facts as one sees them. Do you have a view?

I think users should start to fight back over what is and is not acceptable and I hope you will continue to post corrections!

Good luck William

Why have you reversed all the previous edits of the user before you? I have been watching the edits on the Roman Catholic Church entry over the last year and whenever someone comes along to offer a different opinion it is immediately erased. Occasionally an editor will revert back in totality a variety of previous edits which have been erased over time. Some of the work is impressive, scholarly and much is accepted fact. For example what is wrong with: The term catholic is derived from the Greek adjective καθολικός, katholikos, from the phrase "kath' holou," which is from kata "about" + genitive of holos "whole", thus literally meaning about whole, sometimes loosely translated as "universal." Churches that use the word in their name do so with an implicit claim to be the one, whole Church founded by Christ. This piece keeps coming up and being taken out - why and why are the others being erased without proper debate and consideration on their historical accuracy? WexfordWill 12:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

--WexfordWill 18:42, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../8/2/2E/User_talk%7E82.198.252.2.html"