User talk:82.123.39.41

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You seem to prefer to edit from various anon IP's even though you have an account, which makes it frustrating to try to communicate with you. But since this is the last IP you've been using, I'll post a message here plus at User talk:Bogdanov and hope for the best:
User:YBM has requested mediation with you on the page WP:TINMC, please respond there. Bishonen | talk 23:17, 12 September 2005 (UTC)

I do not understand this anonymus IP which is the same one (Wanadoo) I use since I registered here (maybe it comes from the fact that it is "dynamic" IP). If necessary, I will register again.

Anyway, this is not the problem. Perhaps you have read my post on the discussion page :

"Dear Bishonen, You might not have personal interest in this page, but accept the simple fact that I may have some personal interest in it. After having worked for french television, we spent many, many hard years working on our thesis in the Mathematical laboratory of the University of Bourgone under the supervision of Pr Flato and Sternheimer. All went (more or less) well untill this very "dark day" when Niedermaier sent his mail claiming that our thesis and papers were a hoax. You have to accept the simple fact that our work, all we did for almost 10 years of full dedication, all our sacrifices and efforts were ruined in a few hours. All what happened after, all the suspicions, the critics, the harasment, the CQG email, the "hilarious articles", etc, has been generated by this famous email. To day, this "discussion" on Wikipedia is a direct consequence of Niedermaier's hoax. You have to accept that I may know the whole story and its hidden aspects better than most of the people involved in this debate. Therefore, you should also understand that my implication in this series of revert actions is certainely not a "disgraceful attitude". On the contrary, I have been trying to balance as far as I could all the informations that were thrown on the page of this article without respect to any objective truth. If the article reflects only the Herman Nicolaï and Andrew Wray CQG November 1, 2005 email, it projects a very negative and unbalanced image on our work. This is the reason why I proposed to quote part of the (technically positive) referee"s report appointed by CQG on our work. Not allowing this piece of report to be published in order to balance Mr Wray and Nicolai's negative opinion is an obstacle to the objective information one should expect from Wikipedia. Sincerely, Igor"

We have a major problem with YBM : he is attacking us for years now. Without reason. He is our major ennemy. If you contact the french administrator of Wiki in France at cesar@petitjournal.org he will tell you exactly what kind of person really is YBM.

We are known for years as public figures in France. We beleive (and we hope) we deserve the good reputaiton we build over the past decades. But this YBM is now trying to destroy everything we are : see his "work" on his sites and you should be convinced of what I claim.

This is the reason why I reacted strongly against his intervention on Wikipedia.

Now the question is : how can we get a neutral and balanced article about us? What are the solutions? what should we do?

Sincerely,

Igor

Hi, Igor, I've replied on Talk:Bogdanov Affair. The way to achieve the neutral and balanced article you want is exactly what has, fortunately, already started: mediation. You and YBM really need a mediator, and I believe User:NicholasTurnbull, a skilled mediator, is going to get in touch with you tomorrow. Please give the process a jump start by responding as soon as possible at WP:TINMC, and good luck!
Please note, btw, that the page I refer to in my first message, User talk:Bogdanov is not the same thing as Talk:Bogdanov Affair! It's your personal talkpage, which comes into play when you're logged into your account, User:Bogdanov. You hit the "log in" link top right to log in, it's quite simple (provided you remember the password you set). If you edit logged in, you'll never be in any doubt about getting all messages directed to you, and nobody else will be in any doubt about where to post them. Bishonen | talk 00:07, 13 September 2005 (UTC)