User talk:81.216.236.207

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] About censorship on Lolicon

Mate, the policy for extremely shocking pictures was outlined by Jimbo. WP:NOT censored... for the protection of minors; it can be censored for legal or really obvious obscenity reasons (for example, goatse.cx does not deserve a picture). See [[1]]. Ashibaka tock 21:46, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

Actually, Jimbo's opinions overrule and define policy. Thus, he created the necessity for the linkimage template, and we decided to use it on Lolicon. If you like, you can register an account and upload an image to replace the current one, but the current one cannot stay inline as it is. Ashibaka tock 22:05, 23 January 2006 (UTC)


Please moving the image on the Lolicon page. You are about to violate the 3 revert rule. Maxwahrhaftig 18:38, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 19:45, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your message

You asked me what I meant by my last message. As you can see by other posts on this page, Jimmy Wales has established a clear policy for pictures like the one you continually post on the Lolicon page. As Ashibaka said, this picture may not remain inline (that is, in the position where you edit has it). If you would like to further debate the subject, please do so on the talk page for Lolicon. Otherwise, do not make more edits, or you will be banned from editing Wikipedia. I would hate to see this happen, you could become a valuable contibutor if you obey the rules. By the way, placing four ~'s in a row is an easy way to sign your posts, like I am about to: Maxwahrhaftig 20:17, 24 January 2006 (UTC) Also, the 3RR is an official policy of Wikipedia. You may not revert the same page three times in 24 hours. This rule is intended to prevent edit wars and other unwanted conflicts. This is why you must not continue editing in this way.

This, it's not the picture being put in but the fact that you were going against consensus as outlined on the talk page. As the above notes, the correct way is to discuss this first. The last warning was an error it was supposed to be the 3RR which you had violated. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 22:36, 24 January 2006 (UTC)


As per your request on my talk page, here is an explanation from a "Libertarian point of view." This encyclopedia has ownership. By editing Wikipedia, you are accepting the terms laid out by the owners (regardless of their motives, be they puritanical or not), one of which is that you must not do what you have done. In doing so, you violated that agreement and are subject to exclusion, as described in the terms. The fact that you have not yet been banned is an act of faith on the part of the ownership of Wikipedia, or more specifically, those with whom the ownership has entrusted power of enforcement: the administrators. They are doing this in the hopes that you will decide to obey the rules and become a valuable contributor. I hope this happens too. Here is an explanation from an Anarchistic perspective, which may be easier to understand. The administrators can ban you, and you can't ban them. If you don't do what they want, they will force you out. I'm sorry that you don't like the censorship - and I do agree that it is censorship - but this encyclopedia operates by consensus and Jimbo's dictates, and you must accept that if you wish to contribute. Maxwahrhaftig 00:09, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../8/1/2E/User_talk%7E81.216.236.207.html"