User talk:80.237.206.62

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Appears to be safe on OP ports, please watch it though -- Tawker 02:49, 27 September 2006 (UTC) {{unblock|This server is part of an academic project for overcoming political censorship.}}

In short, if you don't have any vandalism issues it's not a problem. If vandalism pops up blocks happen pretty fast. It's sad that we've had to come to it but we've had to resort to it. I hope all turns out ok, we really are running a fine line between allowing anon access and preventing vandalism. Many IP's that are blocked still let you edit if you are logged in now, maybe that's the best of both worlds. -- Tawker 03:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
This site is part of the JAP Anonyminity program, which is designed to be used by multiple anonymous users. Some of these may abuse the privilege of posting anonymously. However, some users face real political censorship and have no other options available. Thus, one might say there are two categories of users, one of which ruins it for the other. I suppose the only workable solution is to require that users register for wikipedia accounts -- will that prevent total blockage of the IP address? It unfortunately would also tenously link users to their contributions, which could be genuinely dangerous for some people. (You may not appreciate the unfortunate but real need for anonymous access to sites like this.)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hal Turner. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Reaper X 02:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Uh, I think it is the part where you say someone is a "Nazi", and he likes to shove dildos in his ass,see the edit here. --Reaper X 03:02, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
An important message

This notice has been left for you because another Wikipedia user suspects that, perhaps innocently, you may have defamed someone in your contributions. Please recheck your edits. Do not make allegations against someone unless you have provided evidence from a reliable publication, and then make sure you describe the allegations in accordance with our content policies, particularly Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research. Don't rely on hearsay, rumours, or things you believe without evidence to be facts, and don't use sources to create a novel narrative. Wikipedia requires reliable sources for all claims. Please see our policy on biographies of living persons.

Comments that defame an individual may leave you open to being sued by them. While Section 230 of the United States Communications Decency Act may protect Wikipedia from being sued for defamation, it may not protect the person who posted a defamatory claim on a Wikipedia page. The Wikimedia Foundation's Board of Trustees has ruled that: "Where the user has been vandalizing articles or persistently behaving in a disruptive way, [personal information] data may be released to assist in the targeting of IP blocks, or to assist in the formulation of a complaint to relevant Internet Service Providers." (Wikimedia privacy policy in full)

If you may have inadvertently defamed someone in an article, do two things:

  1. If the material is still there, remove it immediately.
  2. Leave a note on the administrator's noticeboard saying that you have accidentally included defamatory claims in a named article or articles. Don't repeat the claims. The claim can then be deleted from the page history.

Yamaguchi先生 02:58, 30 September 2006

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../8/0/2E/User_talk%7E80.237.206.62.html"