User talk:75.18.113.152

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Contents

[edit] September 2006

[edit] Bogus Warnings from Vandal:Devilmaycares

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. devilmaycares

I see that, in fact, you have been blocked. But, one way or another, I haven't anything to fear from your last warnings; I don't vandalize pages, as you have. I try to ensure that they report brute facts, however inconvenient they may be to this-or-that party; and I work to adjust word-choice to leave normative judgments to the reader. —75.18.113.152 02:22, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
What, exactly, do you expect to flow from your warnings and reports? The admins don't simply accept your complaint; they investigate. And, because of that process of investigation, I have nothing to fear from your warnings nor from your complaints. —75.18.113.152 06:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] What the Devil?!?

Man, I have no clue what is going wrong with Wikipedia right now. If anyone has a problem with how my edits are being rendered, I ask them to please examine the underlying source before taking a poke at me. —75.18.113.152 06:31, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 2006

[edit] Request for checkuser

You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. For an outcome to be achieved, we require you list the code letter which matches with the violations of policy, which is listed at the top of the requests for checkuser page. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. Also, a checkuser has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant 06:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC), checkuser clerk.

[edit] December 2006

[edit] Re. Questionable Demand for Warnings

Actually, there's currently a discussion on whether removing comments/warnings left on a talk page can be considered vandalism. Users are generally not being blocked for doing so. Regards.--Húsönd 02:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

I've no doubt that in some contexts removals should be allowed. But
  1. If a policy is in flux or has changed, then that should be noted in rejecting a complaint about violation.
  2. In this case, the editor is blocked for prohibitted use of sockpuppets, and one of his edits to the talk page was to remove an infobox listing the accounts under which he has editted. In other words, he is trying to hide evidence pertinent to any discussion of unblocking him.
Anyway, thanks for the clarification of your position. —75.18.113.152 02:50, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../7/5/2E/User_talk%7E75.18.113.152.html"