User talk:72.234.240.129

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions.

Currently, you are editing without a username. You can continue to do so, as you are not required to log in to Wikipedia to read and edit articles; however, logging in will result in a username being shown instead of your IP address (yours is 72.234.240.129). Logging in does not require any personal details, and there are many other benefits for logging in.

When you edit pages:

  • Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
  • Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
  • If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
  • Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such content or editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. For now, if you are stuck, you can click the edit this page tab above, type {{helpme}} in the edit box, and then click Save Page; an experienced Wikipedian will be around shortly to answer any questions you may have. Also feel free to ask a question on my Talk page. I will answer your questions as far as I can! Thank you again for contributing to Wikipedia. Kukini 04:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Editing Concerns

  1. Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. The information is not duplicated. Please discuss in the talk page before further reverts. Kukini 04:10, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] David Loren Cunningham

Just out of curiosity, are you David Loren Cunningham? I notice that the only edits you've made to Wikipedia are directly related to his article, and you seem to have personal knowledge of the Path to 9/11 film-making situation.

Anyway, the real point is that WP by necessity can't come down on one side or the other of a controversy--it has to present both sides, fully and fairly, and let the readers make up their minds. There are many situations where a particular editor may feel that one side is right and the other wrong, but that doesn't mean that we can abandon the neutral point of view policy and slant the article toward our perception of the debate. Nareek 14:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

I continue to wonder about your identity because, after declining to answer here a straightforward response to the question of whether you're the subject of the article, you've offered a series of roundabout responses that, if read in a legalistic manner, do not exclude the possibility that you are in fact David Loren Cunningham. No offense, but it reminds me very much of the way Bill Clinton initially answered questions about Monica Lewinsky--what "is" is and all that. Nareek 12:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../7/2/2E/User_talk%7E72.234.240.129.html"