User talk:72.20.207.29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Guinnog 14:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Guinnog 14:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Threatning is not the way to go. Who said I was vandalising. As you may notice I have only made legit changes. Just because you don't agree with my changes doesn't mean I am vandalising. If so, then you have been vandalising every page you have ever edited.

I did. The edit that prompted your warning from me (not a threat) was [1], where you removed referenced material from the 2006 FIFA World Cup article without explanation. This was considered as vandalism by me and I see no reason to revise my opinion. In future, if you wish to remove material, explain your reasoning in an edit summary or better still in the article talk page. --Guinnog 20:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
So for this 1 unexplained change I made I get 2 warnings. Ok, thank you for clearing that up. 72.20.207.29 20:36, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
No, the second warning was for this [2]. It might be wise to explain better what your intentions are when making an edit like this in the future if you wish peopel to be clear it is not vandalism, which is what it looked like. --Guinnog 20:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Sign your comments

As a courtesy for other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments and your user name or IP address and the date will be automatically added. For further info see: Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thanks. Paul Cyr 13:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

When I read the signing rule on wikipedia, it said you "should" sign because it is the polite thing to do. But "should" means you don't have to. Now if they made it mandatory, then they would just implement that every posting on discussions would have the signatures. But the option is left open.

[edit] Talk page deletion

Please stop. If you continue to remove legitimate warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Khukri (talk . contribs) 20:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

How am I suppose to know this isn't my page. I thought it was my page and yet everyone is going left and right given me warning for something I dont' know. Not everyone knows every rule on wikipedia.
Let me give you a hint, read some of the rules on conduct and you won't fall foul of any other editors or admins in the future. Below is a standard welcome message and gives you a starting point. Regards Khukri (talk . contribs) 20:29, 27 September 2006 (UTC)


Welcome!

Hello, 72.20.207.29, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 


[edit] Super Smash Brothers

I happen to agree with your changes on the Super Smash Brothers page regarding the supposed best player in the world Ken Huang. The existence of the best player in the world cannot be proven (especially if there is no concrete reference). It is a valid statement to say that he is assumed by many to be the best but even for that there should be a reference. It is not a known fact by SSB players that he is in fact the best player in the world. Unless it is some legend only spread by word of mouth, there has to be a reference regarding the fact that he is the best.--Iamholland 17:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to National Association of Evangelicals

Your recent edit to National Association of Evangelicals (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 15:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure why the bot marked your edits as vandalism, they seemed pretty reasonable to me. I reverted the bot's edits. · j e r s y k o talk · 16:02, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../7/2/2E/User_talk%7E72.20.207.29.html"