User talk:70.61.23.238

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --digital_me(t/c) 01:50, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Re: changes made to Mail Order Bride

Reading through the content you removed, I don't really see how it duplicates content already present in the sections that you didn't attempt to remove.--digital_me(t/c) 02:14, 30 May 2006 (UTC)


Can you please explain here why you think that there is a POV problem with the comments regarding the Atlanta and Ohio TRO decisions? It is clear from the court's docket the TRO in Georgia was extended BY CONSENT of the parties --- do I need to link to that to convince you?? Also, if you bother to actually read the Ohio TRO decision you will see that the bracketed portion paraphrases 4 pages of the court's analysis explaining why there is "no substantial liklihood of sucess" on the 1st Amendment claims and thus, why the TRO was denied.... 68.33.186.81 02:24, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism on Mail-order bride

Hi. I notice you and another fellow are in a revert war on Mail-order bride. Vandalism is when somebody comes to an article and intentionally adds garbage. I don't believe that either you or the other editor are vandals. Please stop calling one another names; one of the things that makes this place work is civility. Also, if you plan on continuing to contribute, I encourage you to register and log in. Thanks, --William Pietri 15:06, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] "Vandalism"

Please stop calling Michaellovesnyc's edits vandalism in your edit summaries. Even though you and I disagree with his edits, he really does seem to be editing in good faith, so it's bad etiquette. I know he's being difficult and it's frustrating, but I am going to go to Requests for comment soon and I think he'll be told to stop, so don't worry too much. You might also want to read about the three revert rule and ensure you're not violating it. --Grace 23:12, 3 June 2006 (UTC)