User talk:69.250.130.215

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Your edit to Welcome to Collinwood

Your recent edit to Welcome to Collinwood was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 16:30, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your question on Shen Gong Wu

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Also, please leave questions to the talk pages of articles. Since the Orb of Tornami has never been used with the Reversing Mirror, we will never know what it does. It could produce earth, it could dry up lakes or oceans, but speculation is not meant for Wikipedia. This is why only uses (and their known effects) are listed under "Reversing Mirror & Any Shen Gong Wu" in the article. Ryulong 21:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit

Thanks for your note, but I would point out that if you add obscene messages to your edits, this is usually regarded as a strong indication of vandalism. The only other contribution you made was changing a ":" to a "...". Please try to be constructive and restrained in future. Bwithh 21:39, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

I have just noticed that you have further chosen to insult me through a message attached to an otherwise insubstantive edit to the Big Rock Candy Mountain article. Please read WP:CIVIL. I hope I will not be forced to take matters further. Bwithh 21:43, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Further possible vandalism

I have also noticed and reverted your possible personal attack vandalism of the Palmer Cox article. Unless you have verified evidence from authoritative sources that this person is widely considered a racist, you should not insert your personal opinons into the article. This breaks WP:OR and WP:NPOV. It may also be considered vandalism if a suspect pattern of edits emerges. Bwithh 22:04, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] No personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. (Even when you think an editor is supporting a reprehensible position you must still treat them civilly. It's not an option.) -Will Beback 06:02, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Dismbiguation

The purpose of a dismbiguation page is not to give a short characterizaiton of each article. The purpose is simply to give enough informaiton to allow readers to find the article they were looking for. See Wikipedia:disambiguation and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). Since there are no other websites called "Stormfront" we don't need to describe it further on the disambiguation page. -Will Beback 22:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Whatever your point may be...

Whatever your point may be, please read WP:POINT - Nunh-huh 23:38, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to David Duke, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 22:06, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Leo Felton on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ScorpO 02:12, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/9/2E/User_talk%7E69.250.130.215.html"