User talk:69.248.237.88

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This message is regarding the page The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jkelly 00:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

This message is regarding the page The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Jkelly 00:44, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi. Please see WP:NPOV. A careful reading of the applicable policy should answer your concerns. To summarize, the fact that the text continues to fuel conspiracy-theory in the modern world is mentioned in the article with specific examples and NPOV states that fringe views should be mentioned, but identified as such. As I noted in my edit summary, we don't say "Many believe that the Earth is spherical" because of the Flat Earth Society. Jkelly 00:50, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
If you're convinced that your rephrasing is an improvement, you should be able to convince others at Talk:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Until then...

Please do not keep undoing other people's edits without discussing them first. This is considered impolite and unproductive. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Jkelly 02:54, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] User:Jkelly and admin action

Hi. Your editing has been reverted by me, User:Antandrus and User:Humus Sapiens. It is not obvious to me that, because I have taken the time to interact with you on your Talk page that I am overly-involved in the matter to the point where my judgement is questionable. That being said, if you do violate the three-revert rule, it is not that much effort for me to list it on the violations page like any other user. Jkelly 04:04, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit

This is regarding [1]
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you were just trying to experiment, then use the sandbox instead. Thank you. ←Humus sapiens←ну? 05:29, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Flemming Rose

Please do not add unverified information to wikipedia. You seem to have a habit of these sorts of activities, and if you do not begin respecting wikipedia policies, you will be blocked. --InShaneee 04:01, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

  • That's my point. It's speculation, which is against wikipedia policy. Now, this is your last warning. One more revert and you will be blocked. --InShaneee 04:07, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
    • You still have yet to show any evidence that ANYONE besides yourself. A claim of this sort MUST be backed up by several reliable sources. --InShaneee 04:11, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
      • It doesn't matter if other users claim this. If it can't be backed up by an INDEPENDANT, RELIABLE source, it can't be stated here. --InShaneee 04:26, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
      • Is that you Catstail you sneaky devil?? Netscott 04:19, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
        • Is that you Ronam?? Those warnings and blocks you've acquired look reeeaaallll good! ;) Netscott 04:22, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

I see well ok then... welcome to WikiPedia! It's always nice to help others learn how WikiPedia works... especially when it comes to the three-revert rule and Neutral Point of View. You take it easy now ;-) Netscott

[edit] Block

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours for violating wikipedia's policy of no personal attacks. If you continue to use such language when you come back, you will simply be blocked for a longer period of time. --InShaneee 04:32, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/9/2E/User_talk%7E69.248.237.88.html"