User talk:69.162.173.26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert an article to a previous version more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. Fieari 03:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

I am , however, permitted to revert vandalism. Removal of verified information by an admittedly biased user is vandalism, restoration is not a violation of the three revert rule. Under no circumstances is removal of valid information from wiki "good faith".
It is good faith if I believe in all honesty that I'm improving the wiki, which I do. You disagree with me, but that doesn't make me a vandal. It means that we have a disagreement. Fieari 03:48, 15 June 2006 (UTC)
Apparently, we've been asked to come to an agreement, which I'm not sure is reasonable considering it's a simple question of wether a specific piece of information will be included or not. This is not a case of "interpreting" phrasing and such. Therefore, I ask this question, since you don't question the accuracy of the information, how does omission of relevant information improve the wiki?

[edit] Perverted-Justice.com

It's a minor issue at best, the AKA. Let's not edit war and warn over such things, come to an agreement. Teke 03:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Teke, what is the "shorthand" which leaves an ID tag at the end of the message entry, for instance, (User talk:Teke| 03:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)?

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/9/2E/User_talk%7E69.162.173.26.html"