User talk:69.145.123.171

The word does seem a bit wonky at first glance, but it refers to someone whose philosphy is Romanticism. "Romantic" is used more commonly, though. Ladlergo 12:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Troll-speak

Sorry, I don't speak troll. 69.145.123.171 Hello! Wednesday, July 5, 2006, 06:57 (UTC)

Couldn't help but laugh at that! EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 18:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aly & AJ

I'm sorry, I have had no intention of ignoring you. I wasn't aware that I had new massages until just this afternoon. I apologize. As for them being classified as Pop Rock, I myself was contemplating using that description, and have no problem with you changing it to that. I think that Pop Rock would actually be the best description for their Wiki page anyway. Jay 18:33, 5 July 2006 (UTC) P.S. Just wanted to say I read you're reason for remaining an anon, and I just wanted to say Good Luck! Jay 18:37, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem! Glad we could come to an agreement on the subject! I know what it's like to have a bad week, actually the last few of mine haven't been the greatest. But I hope you have a good day and a better week. Talk to you later. Oh, and let me know if you're IP Adress changes again, I'd like to keep in touch. Thanks. Jay 19:28, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

No problem, it's nice to know there are other people interested in keeping the Aly & AJ page up to date and accurate. Look forward to editing more articles with you! Have a good one! Jay 20:29, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thumbs-up

Just wanted to give you a pat on the back for breaking my fragile little brain every time I see an IP reverting vandals and carrying on cogent, intelligent conversations while I'm doing RC patrol or elsewhere. It comes as a bit of a shock, you know. *grins* Keep up the good work! Tony Fox (speak) 16:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Romanticist

The word does seem a bit wonky at first glance, but it refers to someone whose philosphy is Romanticism. "Romantic" is used more commonly, though. Ladlergo 12:16, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Y HELO THAR

Brain thought process:

• IP. Hmm.
• HOLY CRAP! A user page?
• ...a well designed user page?
• Aand he seems to be pretty cool...

Just a quick question for when you're back, I know you say it's complicated but could you at least try to explain why it "isn't your decision"? I'm just curious, you don't have to. :) User:127001/sig 12:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

That's fine. :) User:127001/sig 06:25, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Wikipedia:Requests for comment/F.O.E.

I noticed you were in some recent edits with User:F.O.E. and decided to notify you on his newly opened RFC. Thank you! — The King of Kings 00:38 July 08 '06

[edit] Wow, you're pretty cool

Buy a static IP =)

--TheEmoEater 01:38, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, and don't stay away for too long! --Robdurbar 13:13, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hey

Just read your userpage: hope you ditch AOL soon and we get our best IP contributor back. :) --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 05:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Ditto. GeorgeMoney (talk) 05:57, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

PS: Super-voop. GeorgeMoney (talk) 05:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Things that made me feel good when I wanted to leave...

[edit] PLEASE

Don't leave!!! I respect your wishes, but please don't let one incident bring you down. I've dealt with trolls, and I almost left, but didn't. Just take a wikibreak and see how bad you would feel without the wiki. Please don't leave. You are an big part of this community and you can do alot to help the project. It is not worth leaving over one user.

If you leave you are letting him get what he wants. You don't want him to bring you down, and don't let him.

But, if I can't convince you to stay..... well..... goodbye and you will be missed by many, many people. GeorgeMoney (talk) 08:40, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Honestly...

I do not really understand why the feud actually occured now, because it has already known that sysops technically now have the option to selectively block anonymous IP users and prevent collatertal damage on established users. - Mailer Diablo 13:39, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

And I did not block your other accounts as I realized it would be improper unless you actually did anything wrong with them - administrators can have common sense, you know :) Cowman109^Talk 15:54, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Good anon contributors are hard to come by

It's always great to see an anon IP contributor really make contributions to Wikipedia, so I'm really sorry to see that you're leaving. It's really too bad that there was a blocking mix up - I hope you consider returning one day, perhaps as a different anon IP; even if we don't know you're back, your contributions will always be appreciated. -- Natalya 15:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Anon/User it doesn't really matter, but you shouldn't let things like that put you off your good editing on Wikipedia

Obviosuly, if you're not having fun, then leave. But just remember that when things go wrong occaisionally, the majority of the time Wikipedia is a fun, exciting and informative place to work. If your situation with AOL means that you can't edit at times, then its frustrating - I have experienced similar enforced no edit periods due to a number of reasons and its annoying but there are other leisure activities than Wikipedia... What I'm saying, is that don't let a bad few incidents tar your memory of a good time here, and of the fact that you've clearly made a hell of an impact.

p.s. whatever you decide to do, if you can, leave AOL - they're c**p enough as it is without the whole Wikipedia editing issue. Robdurbar 16:42, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Oh no...

Not you, my sweet 69, don't tell me you're leaving... this is just what I needed to crown a real bad day... :( Dear 69, please, I urge you to remember how many of us love you and like and appreciate all you've done. I'm not aware of the problems you've experienced, but know that I'll always be willing to listen to you and help you in any way I can. Mail me, I'd be so happy to listen to you and assist you if it's whithin my modest possibilities. Sad day, sad indeed :( Love you, always, Phaedriel ♥ The Wiki Soundtrack!♪ - 17:16, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

My sentiments, dear Phaedriel, and 69.145.123.71—you're famous as an IP editor and in Esperanza…we can't have you leave! :'( —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-C|ε|L|T|♪-) 20:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

--Pilotguy ^{(roger that)} 20:55, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Hey, c'mon, that's not cool...as someone said above, if you leave, he wins. You prove his point that anons shouldn't be able to edit and make good contributions. I hope you'll reconsider... --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 05:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] test wiki

apparently hildanignt came to the test wiki under the name "the hildan". Just letting you know. GeorgeMoney (talk) 21:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ...And after I came back and was feelin' pretty bad...

[edit] Smile

: )

Enough said. -- Natalya 13:33, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

You can do better than that, Natalya! ;) 00:32, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

$PЯINGεrαgђ has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Smile to others by adding {{subst:smile}}, {{subst:smile2}} or {{subst:smile3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Happy editing!

[edit] One other minor thing

Is J.L.W.S. the Special One attacking you here? —$ΡЯΙNGεrαgђ (-¢|ε|Ŀ|T|♪-) 00:42, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Don't leave

Please come back. Thank you.--Chili14 01:22, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Can I bribe you back with this?

		The Surreal Barnstar
		For all the trouble you've been thru the past few months, I give you this. —$PЯINGεrαgђ

[edit] Vandalism section

I believed it to be patently inflammatory and harmful to the community. You may request review at WP:DRV if you wish. Other vandalism pages may also merit deletion. --Improv 00:22, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

'S okay. Vandalism pages are just prety silly anyway, though. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:35, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hi!!

I love it. I've never seen a user who's built such a page around an IP address! It's nice to meet you, too! Thank yo for the warm welcome. - Lucky 6.9 04:43, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] V page

Yeah, that tag plus protection is a pretty good way to keep recreation from happening :) Take care. --Improv 16:15, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Heh

Let's hope so! By the way, if you've an interest in the Irish language, I'm sure I could find some links to some "learn Irish online" type websites for ya! hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 00:01, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] re:I never got the time to thank you

No problem. I am either going to start a request for arbitration against him, or going to WP:AN/WP:AN/I for a second opinion. His lack of response has me thinking he was just trolling, and left because of the RFC opened against him. — Moe Epsilon 20:12 September 12 '06

*nods* Yes, but because of his inactivity, no edits since July, he might not be worth the trouble of blocking. But I guess we'll find out :) — Moe Epsilon 20:16 September 12 '06

[edit] A question about your signature

How do you edit the timestamp part of your signature? —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  01:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Ok, now I know. (It's something to do with the subst:TIMES.) —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  15:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] reply

What's the point in standing strong against trolls when there are more trolls than "good editors" and when some "good editors" aren't as trustworthy as some may seem. — Moe Epsilon 14:51 September 21 '06

*shakes head* I try, an you do good yourself. :) — Moe Epsilon 01:02 September 23 '06

[edit] I want to know something

How do you customize your signature like that since you have no user preferences? Is it a template?--Chili14 01:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, it is. —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  02:46, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Administrative nomination

I have seen you use and improve wikipedia quite often. I would like to nominate you for administrator status. Do you accept the nomination? If so, leave a message on my talk page.--Awsom-o-3000 04:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Um, correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe (to the project's shame on one side and credit on the other) that IPs can't be admins. Which is too bad in this case. :( —  $PЯINGεrαgђ  04:24, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Ha, ha, ha... This is an inside joke. ;) 69.145.123.171 _{Yes, I'm really an IP} Wednesday, October 25, 2006, 21:53 (UTC)

[edit] For my friend 69.145.123.171

For being my friend and all that goes with it, I, $PЯINGεrαgђ, give you this cream tart. Enjoy! Well, 69.etc., I haven't talked to you too much since I met you, but I've seen it's not too easy being an IP standing up to abusive administrators (thank God we have some sane ones), so even if I don't know you too well, you still deserve this. :)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks a load. Actually, I'm still kind of confused, but I'll figure it out eventually. I hope.

[edit] Wow. You definetely get a barnstar.

		The Original Barnstar
		For being the only anonymous IP that doesn't stick out in my mind as a vandal. I award you a barnstar for proving the anons aren't all bad. --SonicChao talk 22:49, 22 November 2006 (UTC)