User talk:68.239.253.198

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Neck Face, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 20:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Analog Alliance

The purpose of this website is as an encyclopedia, which is a tertiary source, not a primary or secondary source. What this means is that things must already be known about in the wider world for them to be encyclopedic. To put this in perspective, if the world's leading authority on physics, for example, wanted to publish a new phenomenon he had discovered here, it would not be proper because we are not a primary source (nor is original research allowed). Please see Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. The article you posted is unverified, unsourced and does not assert any notability. For that reason, it should be deleted unless you as the poster provide bases for its inclusion. You have interpreted my use of Google incorrectly. It is enough to say that the article is unverfieid, unsourced and has no assertion of notability. I went one step beyond and attempted to check myself whether I could find any basis to avoid the step of proposing the article's deletion by using Google as a tool. You are absolutely correct that there are subjects that may be encyclopedic and have no Google presence. That is entirely besides the point.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/8/2E/User_talk%7E68.239.253.198.html"