User talk:68.231.54.18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Themindset 18:55, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Sms.ac

Err, I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish here. But, when people revert your changes, please don't just keep making the same change over and over. If you have something to say about the article, try the talk page. Friday (talk) 18:20, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

Saying that other editors have a "hitler complex" is needlessly rude. Please don't do that. Friday (talk) 19:33, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you in bad faith add a db tag to that article again, you will be blocked. Others and I agree that the article is not an attack page--if you disagree, please take it to WP:AfD. 21:07, 2 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Please stop

Again, please stop with the deletion nomination on Sms.ac. It won't accomplish anything. If you want to edit the article contructively, please do so, or voice your objections on the talk page. Friday (talk) 15:04, 11 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Welcome and What is Wikipedia

Good day. I notice from your contributions that you may be an employee or PR agent for SMS.ac, Inc. I thank you for engaging reasonably as an editor at that company's article. However, I would like to remind you that Wikipedia is not a soapbox, and that removing or rewording well-sourced claims and criticisms from the article may not be a good idea. Once again, thank you for your edits! Stifle (talk) 08:41, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] user Stifle NPOV violation

Your removal of sourced items to place your negative bias into the article is a violation of the NPOV policy.

The Article which was used as a source was retracted by the source and the language I used which indicated that the password was optional was included in the corrected source.

The wording you have put into the article is no longer validly sourced since the article it came from was retracted by the news source. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.231.54.18 (talk • contribs) 08:48, 13 July 2006 (UTC).

This message relates to SMS.ac, Inc. and the person who left the message may be an employee or PR agent.
I have only included well-sourced material in the article. WP:NPOV contemplates that all points of view are adequately represented, not that criticism is arbitrarily suppressed. If you find an article which states that SMS.ac is the best thing since sliced bread and everyone in the world should join it (or similar), please do add it in. Stifle (talk) 08:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
The source article you used is not valid. It was clarified and revised by the source. Read the comments at the bottom of the Talk page. You have removed a direct quote from the source material and replaced it with a fabrication.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.231.54.18 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC).
Please sign your posts on talk pages using ~~~~.
I have fabricated nothing, but in order to avoid misconstruction and unverifiable claims, I have reworded the criticisms section. Stifle (talk) 09:17, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
The source article you used is not valid. It was clarified and revised by the source. Read the comments at the bottom of the Talk page. You have removed a direct quote from the source material and replaced it with a fabrication.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.231.54.18 (talk • contribs) 09:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC).
Please sign your posts on talk pages using ~~~~.
I have fabricated nothing, but in order to avoid misconstruction and unverifiable claims, I have reworded the criticisms section. Stifle (talk) 10:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/8/2E/User_talk%7E68.231.54.18.html"