User talk:67.161.252.235

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

[edit] TV.com

Hello. Regarding your TV.com edits, please make sure that you maintain a neutral point of view, cite your sources, and don't conduct any original research. I removed the Heavy Criticism section from the page because it violated all of these Wikipedia policies. If your claims are published by a reputable publication, then you may cite the information that publication has gathered. Thanks. Jtrost 12:34, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

As I've stated before to Perfecto, how the hell can I give you people a creditable source when the majority of this happened behind closed doors, and you already told me that all the proof I gave you once before in the talk page about Tv.com (that came directly off their website) wasn't allowed. I find it bullshit that every modirator allowed these people to raise hell with everything involving their website on here. When we tried to prove that they were full of crap, we were told we needed more proof. And when we asked for them to show records and proof that we were lying, they couldn't. AND YOU STILL TOOK THEIR WORD OVER OURS. Plus, not only are we not allowed to post the truth about them, but we can't even have a listing for alternative websites like EpGuides.com and TvRage.com. If you're going to keep this up and only take the point of view of the bigger sites around here, then I see no reason to discuss it any further. It's already been establised that the mods here think we're full of shit. --GenuineMind--

Wikipedia is not here to "take a side". We simply look at objective facts, weigh them against Wikipedia policies, and based on that make decisions on whether or not content should stay or go. I am not taking your side or TV.com's side. I'm simply abiding by Wikipedia policies. The Heavy Criticism section violates all of Wikipedia's policies, so it cannot be published here. Additionally, you do not cite any sources, and therefore your content is seen as original research.
If you feel that my decisions or any other editor's decisions are unfair, I strongly urge you to register an account and file a complaint for mediation. Again, I am being as fair as possible in editing the TV.com article, and I am not trying to hurt anyone's feelings or take sides. However, if you insist on adding the Heavy Criticism section, I would strongly urge you to register an account and take this issue to mediation so we can reach a resolution. Jtrost 18:52, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

No offense, but your site isn't worth registering an account to. I've seen how members get treated, and how information is translated. If this place were actually serious, you'd be hitting up the Library Of Congress for info. Not random millions of people with free time on their hands to post info about the one subject they paid attention to in college, or happen to be a part of on the net. Aside from the fact that I'm proof of that, it's just my opinion. And Mediation would only be a waste of my time, especially since it's very clear I cannot win this argument, or at least persuade a change in future policy. If I was considered an unreliable source with actual source material from the website itself, I'm fairly confident that my case would be shut before it had time to breathe. I'd be more confident in this place if it were formatted better and managed under better terms and policies. Sorry, but a Google search is a lot more accurate, honest, and unbiast than this place could ever be. And it's a shame that people like me have to find that out the hard way. --GenuineMind--

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/7/2E/User_talk%7E67.161.252.235.html"