User talk:67.101.192.188

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Rms125a@hotmail.com.
Please refer to this contribution, in which he identifies himself as rms125a@hotmail.com, for evidence. See block log.

I see you've been making some quality edits. You should consider creating a user account. Welcome to Wikipedia!!!!--ragesoss 00:44, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Regarding the page Mervyn Pike, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Demiurge 20:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Changing pages

If you create a user account, you could make such changes yourself; also, for requests like that, the proper etiquette is to post to the talk ("discussion") page of the article. Clearly, your post was not vandalism and Demiurge was out of line in calling you a vandal, but most editors would revert edits like yours just because it was not on the talk page. I've moved the article. Best--ragesoss 00:30, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Bwiki comments: ragesoss's remarks were made in response to a 24 January plea from 67.101.192.188 on ragesoss's talk page. Then on 25 January, also on that talk page, Demiurge and ragesoss had a brief discussion, which I have copy-pasted to this talk page (the following section) in order to provide some context. --Bwiki 22:52, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:67.101.192.188

Hi Ragesoss,

Noticed your comment on User talk:67.101.192.188. I wouldn't have used the term "vandalism" if it was an honest mistake by a new user who was unfamiliar with Wikipedia procedures. However, this IP is the same person as User:Rms125a@hotmail.com, who has been here for months and has been blocked multiple times for hate speech, personal attacks, vandalism of user pages and ignoring Wikipedia conventions. Putting editorial comments on the article page once or twice is understandable; doing it over and over again for months even after being told not to is plain vandalism. Hope this explains my use of the word! Demiurge 10:51, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know that; it does. All I saw was the two instances on that article (and no other warnings or explanation on the IP talk page), so I assumed the user was unfamiliar with policy. May the Wiki be with you--ragesoss 15:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/7/2E/User_talk%7E67.101.192.188.html"