User talk:65.185.190.240

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Naconkantari e|t||c|m 23:49, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

Damn, you people are fast.

Testing.


Testing is fun, but don't get carried away. I deleted your edit on Talk:Operation Summer Rains because you posted it at the top in an innappropriate place. If you wish, you can place that comment on the bottom of the page. Thanks! .ιΙ Inhuman14 Ιι.( talk | contrib) 01:18, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Personal Attack

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Ionius Mundus 00:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during August 8, 2006 (UTC) to Martin Luther King, Jr.

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. JD don't talk email me 20:14, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Martin Luther King, Jr., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Krich (talk) 20:15, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

My mistake.

[edit] Mohammed Mossadegh

Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. HawkerTyphoon 19:58, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I guess these standards only apply to me and not the other guy. Thanks for clearing that up. 65.185.190.240 21:52, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Your edits changed the article to make it look like the man in question rigged the vote. If you're going to make slanderous accusations like that, you have to provide proof per WP:RS! HawkerTyphoon 21:57, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm not here to argue politics. Provide a source per WP:RS, or your edits will be reverted again. HawkerTyphoon 22:20, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

I don't know. Does WP:RS let you? remove it and see what happens. HawkerTyphoon 22:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

Like I said, try it and see what happens. Wikipedia has another rule, that is WP:IAR. It doesn't apply for you, however, because your edits were biased and unsourced, and adding them would detract from Wikipedia. Also, in removing all the infor, you will probably be blocked for breaking WP:POINT. HawkerTyphoon 01:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

Look, I'll be honest with you. Read WP:TIGERS. Have a think, and come back to the article after you've had a sleep. See how you can prove your views to yourself first, then think: 'Could I prove these views to an Israeli, an Arab, an American, a Norwegian, and an Iranian, and convince them that they are facts by using newspapers, encyclopaedias, and the like?' Can you, in fact, prove to me - a trainee Officer in the British Royal Navy - that what you are saying is indesputable fact? HawkerTyphoon 01:42, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Venona project

Hi -- In the future, do not use an edit summary to refer to content of an article as an "outright lie". Such inflammatory language diminishes your credibility and is not conducive to a productive discussion of the issue at hand. KarlBunker 23:52, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Left another message on Talk:Opposition to the Vietnam War Blockinblox 01:36, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Hoax

Please do not add a hoax tag to Operation Gladio. This article is not a hoax and this issue has been discussed at unimaginable length on the article talk page. ... al Seabhcán bin Baloney (Hows my driving?) 00:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Again, please stop adding a hoax tag to this article. You have added it 3 times already. If you add it again I will block you. ... al Seabhcán bin Baloney (Hows my driving?) 01:03, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Rather than posting endless numbers of tags on the Gladio article, it would be more productive if you actually discuss it on the talk page and propose changes. In my experience article tags achieve nothing because no-one is ever going to come along with a magic wand and fix the article just because theres a tag on it. Only hard work and participation will achieve anything. Please join us in that hard work if you are interested. ... al Seabhcán bin Baloney (Hows my driving?) 01:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)


Please stop putting up the hoax tag without discussing it on the talk page. You have been blocked and warned before. 81.165.161.21 07:45, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Links

Here are a few you might be interested in[1]. Morton devonshire 02:01, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit] Regarding reversions[2] made on November 30, 2006 to Operation Gladio

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.
The duration of the block is 24 hours.

I'm assuming you're a sock of CJK

William M. Connolley 20:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/5/2E/User_talk%7E65.185.190.240.html"