User talk:65.171.255.181

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, 65.171.255.181, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! 

heya -- nice work on Huntington Beach -- you might want to hold back a bit on the word "attractive" (I think you used it four, maybe five times)... --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 00:18, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Excellent work on digital circuit! - Omegatron 18:12, Mar 21, 2005 (UTC)

Great job on personal rapid transit! I'm going to be giving it another run-through over the next week or so, but you got to a lot of the things that I'd been planning on getting to. Skybum 00:12, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for splitting the text off into different articles, and sorry about the revert - it appeared to me that you were simply removing text critical of the one project. --SPUI (talk) 00:35, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~.

[edit] Clarrification

Hi, noticed your edits on Phage & Antibiotics. The link to the Nature's article's abstract you gave did not seem to clarify which source of water (seawater vs perhaps fresh water) the 2.5 x 10^11 refers to. If you have read the original full Nature article, could you help clarify this? Secondly can you help WP:Cite/WP:Verify the use of silver & mercury in treating diseases. I accept good faith for the information you made into Antibiotics, but I'm not sure that the points raised are appropriate within this particular article: viruses are not antibiotics (they are anti-microbials) and silver & mercury are neither antibiotics nor antimicrobials (if one accepts the definition of each as curreently given in the respective articles).

I've started a discussion on both Talk:Phage and Talk:Antibiotic pages and look forward to any clarification - I suspect 'my education' too :-)

Please note, I'm about to go off on a wikiholiday so it might be a week before I next look-in to wikipedia, so please re-edit/re-insert (with comment) in my absence :-) David Ruben Talk 10:08, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Military intelligence

You added a lot of good stuff in the new section. I'm concerned a bit, however, that the section is too broad - that it covers stuff that the CIA does for the US government, for example, as opposed to DIA or the intelligence functions of the individual military services. In short, is the article about "intelligence work done by the military", or "intelligence work done against opposing military forces"? John Broughton 18:27, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/5/2E/User_talk%7E65.171.255.181.html"