User talk:63.169.104.2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi.

Please don't blank other people's user pages. It's not nice and will get you your editing privileges revoked. Also, I suggest you create a user name and log in before making edits that others may find controversial.

Regards,

UninvitedCompany 22:04, 9 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Hello, Please tell the same thing to the others who constantly edit and delete entire passages as well. be fair man. and on another point, there is no harm in controversy, considering boyer and his friends harrass others that do not agree with them. there is no requirement to create user names and logs as this is a free encyclopedia avaliable to all. was your user page deleted? or was someone else's? IP's can be used by different peoples, in case you do not know that. why do you use the user name univited company?

Contents

[edit] List of surrealist poets

Hi. A number of the people you knocked off the List of surrealist poets appear to be surrealist poets, including Mary Low, whether or not she is a communist. Please do not damage Wikipedia whilst fighting with Daniel Boyers. The List of surrealist poets is just that: a list. Not a selected list. You are wrong to say too many substantial gaps to consider Mary Low. There may well be substantial gaps. Mary's omission only makes them wider, and does not ameliorate them. Your time would perhaps be better spent in filling the gaps, than fighting, but YMMV. Whatever, please take your RV war to talk:List of surrealist poets --Tagishsimon Dear Tagishsimon, that user with the IP Address 63.169.104.2 does have the right to edit, as do you and Dan Boyer.

[edit] Surrealist Movement in the United States

What's going on? Why did you delete the bulk of the article's text? Please use the talk page to discuss your concerns about the article's content instead of using obscure edit summaries like "vested interest"; that's precisely what talk pages are for. Also, always explain the reason for a revert, or you may find your changes reverted back.
If no word is forthcoming from you about this matter, I will undo your most recent changes. You can reply here, use the article's talk page, or use my talk page. --Ardonik.talk() 22:31, Sep 8, 2004 (UTC)

This is my second attempt to reach you. You have reverted a change to the article again. I won't revert back if you reply. Please do so! If you make no attempt at all to reach consensus, your edits may be considered to be vandalism. --Ardonik.talk() 21:54, Sep 14, 2004 (UTC)
Hi. I received your message on my talk page, and posted a lengthy reply there. The gist of it is that I'm glad you're finally willing to talk to us, and that I'll retract the harsh things I said about you if you can finally justify the unilateral (I hate that word, but it's appropriate here) actions you've taken in Surrealist Movement in the United States. I'm asking both you and Daniel Boyer to meet me at the article's talk page. --Ardonik.talk() 18:26, Sep 16, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Consesus

I am trying to reach consensus with everyone here. I also provided my response on your talk page as you requested. Reggae is Surrealism? Can you prove that?

Try actually reading the article. It nowhere states that reggae is surrealism, merely that there has been analysis of reggae from a surrealist perspective. Thus there is no need to prove something that was never stated. --Daniel C. Boyer 17:39, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism warning

If you continue to remove material from article and then revert them when others replace the material against general consensus, you may be banned from editing this site. See Wikipedia:Vandalism and Wikipedia:Bans and blocks for detailed policy information. BCorr|Брайен 17:46, 16 Sep 2004 (UTC)

[edit] Bcorr

Let the record show that my last edit did not remove nothing! I added the removed information back and kept the newly added information on there. I feel an unjust lynching coming on!

[edit] Three Reverts

You have violated Wikipedia policy by reverting the same page three times in a 24 hour period. I strongly urge you to read Wikipedia:Three revert rule, and you have been warned. Any further, flagrant policy violations and you may be blocked from editing. ugen64 04:06, Sep 21, 2004 (UTC)

[edit] 63.169.104.2 will comply

I will comply with the policy rules. I will only edit this page within the three revert rule, but if it is changed,I will edit it back the next day,either way, I will edit it back within policy rules.

[edit] Dispute edits

Do not remove "disputed" tag from an article if it is clear that the dispute is still ongoing and has not been resolved in the talk page. Thanks. -- Infrogmation 18:09, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/3/2E/User_talk%7E63.169.104.2.html"