Talk:6-10 Office

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

There is no reliable source of information provided here; Interviews cannot be taken as de facto reliable; Just as nobody treats Comical Ali's spiel as reliable, even though it was given substantial press coverage. In this case, interviewee could be POV, there has been no established research on the existence of the 6-10 Office, and the "Uphold Justice" and its affiliate sites publicly states that their reports are for the sole purpose of presenting a one-sided view of affairs. No affirmatory research to support the stance of either the interviews or the "General Report" exists. --Miborovsky 03:59, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

I added a cleanup-verify tag because of above, howeever that means we now have box-creep because of "cleanup", "cleanup-mportance" and "cleanup-verify". Why do we have cleanup-importance?RJFJR 18:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


I'm currently working on a better version of this article. If anyone has any sources other than ABC's Lateline, or the Sydney Morning Herald, let me know. I'm not using The Epoch Times becsasue of their Falun Gong links. Kevin 07:51, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../6/-/1/Talk%7E6-10_Office_cc58.html"