User talk:4.156.222.14

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to World Trade Organization. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. ClarkBHM 01:47, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

A critique (or controversy) section is valid if verifiable criticisms/issues from reputable sources can be cited. ClarkBHM 01:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
No, it shouldn't be deleted completely. Use the template {{Template:Citation needed}} to identify material that needs to be correctly cited. ClarkBHM 02:03, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
You wrote "Ok Mr. WTO expert, I'll take the time later this week to go through and edit the criticism section and delete the most biased and unsupported statements. Then I'll add another section that refutes the claims of critics with empirical evidence from reputable sources, although I'm sure my section will be consistently deleted by people who know little about international economics.
That would be great. I'm not concerned about whether or not the WTO deserves the criticisms or not. The fact is, there are verifiable criticisms out there which should be addressed. If you could clean up the section without deleting the whole thing, that would be very helpful. You might also want to look at the edits that User:Ohnoitsjamie made. ClarkBHM 02:14, 20 April 2006 (UTC)