User talk:3dscience
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you for uploading the diagrams. Unfortunately images that are available under a non-commercial/educational use only license are not allowed at Wikipedia. Would you consider licensing them under the GFDL or Creative Commons attribution license? ˉˉanetode╦╩ 22:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
==Image tagging for Image:Bowmans capsule high glomerlular filtration web.jpg== Thanks for uploading Image:Bowmans capsule high glomerlular filtration web.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:06, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- Please disregard the above automated notice, I've updated the other two diagrams you've uploaded with source information. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 21:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Watermarking
Please note that Wikipedia's image use policy does not allow user-created images to be watermarked. --Fritz Saalfeld (Talk) 12:59, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 3dscience edit's to Zygote Media Group
We acknowledge that we have reversed a few changes made to the article, such as Bryan Brandenburg's references because of the frequent managment changes that have occurred - it would be a long list if we started mentioning people that worked there over the past 12 years and their contributions (especially if it was of people who worked there for just two years or less).
[edit] Watermarked images non-GFDL
 |
 |
As stated in the summary of both of the images you released, Image created specifically for use on Wikipedia by Zygote Media Group, www.3dscience.com. They are therefore copyrighted, not GFDL. I have therefore changed the license template to copyrighted. They look really nice, but please reconsider release them under a different license, or they will soon be deleted! -- drybittermelon (talk．contribs) 13:04, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- We'd still like to contribute those images. Given that we don't want to "give away the store" how do you suggest we alter these images so that they don't compete with what we sell on our website? Or what alternate image licensing should we consider? Thanks! 3dscience 21:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
