User talk:24.64.223.203

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 24.64.223.203, is registered to Shaw High-speed Internet, CA, an Internet service provider through which thousands of individual users may connect to the internet. This IP may be randomly assigned to a different person when the current user disconnects. Warnings or messages left on this page may not be received by the intended user. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Christianity. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Christianity, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 23:36, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

God hates us all unequivically? What verse is that? Homestarmy 23:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Elton John, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Deon555talkReview 00:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dakota 03:18, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Gilles Duceppe

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Daniel's page ☎ 02:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. RexNL 16:26, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your test has been removed or reverted: Osama bin Laden

Your change to the page Osama bin Laden was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. ---Casper2k3 00:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Victoria, British Columbia, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -→Buchanan-Hermit™/?! 01:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Ava Devine

Your recent edit to Ava Devine (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your September 15 edits

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Kungfu Adam (talk) 02:43, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Plant, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ucanlookitup 02:49, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Rhode Island Red, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. CaptainVindaloo t c e 15:58, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Decompression sickness, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — ERcheck (talk) 00:08, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for repeated vandalism. If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalizing or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. — ERcheck (talk) 00:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism in Blue Laws

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Blue Laws. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --200.118.217.125 04:52, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Scion (car). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Casper2k3 01:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Blackfoot

Your recent edit to Blackfoot (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:46, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --I already forgot 03:53, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cobalt

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Daniel's page ☎ 03:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Chlorophyll, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Coredesat talk! 01:39, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. alphaChimp(talk) 01:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Portal:Theatre/Intro

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. DVD+ R/W 04:35, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 21 Sep 06

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to If Chins Could Kill: Confessions of a B Movie Actor, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — RevRagnarok Talk Contrib 11:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] More vandalism - should be banned now

This anonymous user deleted cited facts from Free Dominion, without any explanation.Spylab 15:33, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Spylab

[edit] Your edit to James I of England

Your recent edit to James I of England (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ballad

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Addhoc 10:43, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to September, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Royalguard11(Talk·Desk) 03:51, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Thermal energy

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Addhoc 14:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to September

Your recent edit to September (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 17:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during September 26, 2006 (UTC) to Puritan

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. — [[User:Super-Magician|Super-MagiciaPlease stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to [[:{{{1}}}]], you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. n]] (talk • contribs • count) ★ 00:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Drogheda

Have removed your addition of Pearce Brosnan to the Drogheda page. Please see Drogheda talk page.Downunda 02:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Super Mario Bros.. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 00:29, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Super Mario Bros., you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Húsönd 00:31, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Max Plank

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. shotwell 06:22, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The Fox Man of Fire 02:23, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Andrew Forsman on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. JungleCat talk/contrib 23:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Countdown (MuchMusic TV series), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. AZ t 23:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Countdown (MuchMusic TV series), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Ginkgo100 talk · e@ 23:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Vancouver

Your recent edit to Vancouver (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 17:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Vancouver, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Heimstern Läufer 19:07, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing because of your disruptive edits. You are invited to contribute in a constructive manner as soon as the block expires. // Pilotguy (Have your say) 21:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Paul Saint Pierre

Your recent edit to Paul Saint Pierre (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 23:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:JesseW

Your repeated efforts to vandalize articles makes it seem that you are unaware that Wikipedia is a serious project. You have been reported to the administration group for continuing vandalism and an administrator will review your contributions shortly. You may not receive another warning before being blocked, so be careful and be serious from now on. If you are blocked, please reconsider your behavior once the block expires.

Tuxide 03:07, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for 1 week

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy by repeated vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. /wangi 03:17, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your test has been removed or reverted: Poo

Thank you for experimenting with the page Poo on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Casper2k3 21:00, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] October 22 (UTC) edits

Thank you for experimenting with the page Egyptian pyramids on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. — ERcheck (talk) 00:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Religion. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 01:41, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Shy Guy

Thank you for experimenting with the page Shy Guy on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- ReyBrujo 00:34, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Cuteness in Japanese culture

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Cuteness in Japanese culture, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.  freshofftheufoΓΛĿЌ  08:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Mak (talk) 03:45, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

This IP address has been blocked for 6 months. I understand this is a shared-IP, but the amount of vandalism coming from this IP is absurd. Any user who wishes to make useful additions need only register an account and login to continue editing. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:09, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Note, I have checked a few other IP addresses in this subnet, and haven't seen anything like the vandalism which this IP had generated. That makes me believe this IP is not just being used by a random collection of subscribers, which makes me even less worried about the collateral damage aspects of a long-term block. -- RoySmith (talk) 04:17, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Anybody who is inconvenienced by this should just create an account for yourself and continue editing that way. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:17, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


This user's request to have the autoblock on their IP address lifted has been DECLINED.

This is getting absurd; I can't even count how many prior blocks there have been. Anon block only, so long block is reasonable

  • Blocking admin: not provided.
  • Decline reason:

You were blocked directly, and not autoblocked. As stated when you added this template to your talk page (see here), you are using the wrong template and therefore your case for unblock will not be reviewed fully since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock|your reason here}} instead. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 23:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Note: declined unblock requests may only be removed after two days or when the block has expired.


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | unblock | contribs) asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). This unblock request continues to be visible. Do not replace this message with another unblock request.

Request reason: "I have nothing to do with the vandalism caused here yet I am also blocked? I was trying to contribute information on Voltaire's Treatise on Tolerance but am unable to provide any edits. Is there anything I can do or do I just have an unlucky ISP? -- update: I read further information and will try creating an account now."

Decline reason: "Please create an account; it's easy, free, and most important in this case, will allow you to edit freely over this block. :) Find the "sign in/create account" link, top right corner. If you have any trouble or questions, feel free to make another request or make use of the {{helpme}} template. Sorry for the trouble, and please do register!"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired, or after 2 days in the case of blocks of 1 week or longer.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/4/2E/User_talk%7E24.64.223.203.html"