User talk:24.59.105.229

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Movement to impeach George W. Bush. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Gwernol 12:38, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I did not revert your changes to Movement to impeach George W. Bush, a different editor did. I just warned you. if you choose to revert your WP:POV changes back into the article, they will no doubt be removed again. Please be aware of the three revert rule and please take a moment to actually review Wikipedia's policies on retaining a neutral point of view which you appear to be confusing with your point of view. Thanks, Gwernol 12:48, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

I am offended by the inaccurate description of my changes as commentary or personal analysis. I have committed a note to the talk page. Please take a moment to actually read my changes, which are designed to create WP:NPOV and remove some rather startling deviation from the tone expected from an encylopedia ("As Commander-In-Chief In the War On Terror"?!?!). I have revised them to contain an even more neutral tone.

It's worth noting that "neutral" doesn't mean "brain-dead". Bush admits that he violated FISA; describing this as "alleged" is weasel-words. Describing the Military Commissions Act as making something "legal" without noting the substantial controversy over its constitutionality is biased -- and to be relevant in an article on grounds of impeachment, the reaction of impeachment proponents should be noted.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/4/2E/User_talk%7E24.59.105.229.html"