User talk:24.18.98.89

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome!

Hello, 24.18.98.89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  KWH

[edit] Jack Abramoff

I noticed that you added the paragraph about Susan Ralston back under the eLottery heading. This fact is adequately covered within Internet Gambling Prohibition Act (and is based on the same Washington Post source) which is prominently linked. Ralston was Abramoff's assistant at the time, so I'm not sure how significant the email from her is. (The fact that the money came from eLottery and was laundered through non-profits is significant to the legality). The main article, Jack Abramoff, doesn't need to contain all of these details, just an 'appetite-whetter' to allow interested readers to click through to the various detailed articles.

Also, I noticed that you seem to use the external links to SourceWatch within the text for certain individuals. (Tony Rudy, eLottery). This is generally discouraged. Per m:When should I link externally:

"Not very often. If the site you are linking to is an article, history or timeline, then wikipedia should have its own article on that subject, not just an external link. The web is already full past capacity of sites composed of links to other sites."

Wikipedia should have it's own articles on these individuals (and preferably, even better than SourceWatch).

Other than that, thanks for the positive work, and you should consider creating an account! KWH

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/4/2E/User_talk%7E24.18.98.89.html"