User talk:24.11.154.78

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice, provided that it is appropriate.
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link.
  • Your own user page.
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address.
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you.
  • The ability to start new pages.
  • The ability to rename pages.
  • The ability to edit semi-protected pages.
  • The ability to upload images.
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behavior of the website.
  • The eligibility to become an administrator.
  • The right to be heard in votes and elections.
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We hope you enjoy your time here on Wikipedia and that you choose to become a Wikipedian by creating an account. Feel free to ask me any questions you may have on my talk page. By the way, you should sign your name to your posts and comments with ~~~~. --StuffOfInterest 02:42, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bill O'Reilly (commentator)

Please stop deleting linked/sourced information from the Bill O'Reilly (commentator) article. Just because you have proclaimd a source as "bias" [sic] does not make the information false. Please join the discussion on the talk page of the article before making further unwarranted edits or deletions. Thanks.Hal Raglan 18:25, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

If you look at the talk page, you will see that I HAVE been discussing the changes.

Do not continue blanking sections on Bill O'Reilly (commentator). If you do, your edits will be treated as vandalism and dealt with accordingly. —Viriditas | Talk 22:33, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

How is it vandalism when I am discussing it? I am not trying to vandalize the article and I take exception to your accusation that I am. I will leave it alone since you are so adament about it, but I would hardly say it is not disputed since I am disputing it now. A simple solution would be for you to replace the section WITH appropriate citations to sources, then I would not have any grounds to dispute it, nor would I want to. All I am asking for are a few sources so I can verify the validity of the claim 24.11.154.78 23:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

The validity of the claim is not in question. Sources have been provided, and O'Reilly admits making the claim (as reported in the The Washington Post and as seen in the archived BookExpo video on C-SPAN). This topic has been well-covered in the media, and I suggest you do some basic research. —Viriditas | Talk 00:01, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

I was doing basic research on this online encyclopedia and I wanted to see more sources, and now that some sources have been given I have no problem with the claim.

FYI, your comments will hold more weight and you will be taken more seriously if you register a user name. Additionally, a registered user name will give you benefits as described above, in addition to being able to edit semi-protected pages. —Viriditas | Talk 01:31, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi there! Thanks for experimenting with the page Bill O'Reilly (commentator) on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 03:54, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/4/2E/User_talk%7E24.11.154.78.html"