User talk:219.78.221.58

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
Attention:

This IP address is registered to NETVIGATOR (Hong Kong). Comments left on this page may be received by other users of this IP and appear to be irrelevant. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking. In the event of vandalism from this address, efforts will be made to contact NETVIGATOR (Hong Kong) to report abuse.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address, note that this need not necessarily be the IP address of your machine. In many cases, it turns out to be the IP address of a proxy server that communicates between your browser and the Wikimedia servers. Such proxies are shared among a huge number of users compared to the number of persons using your particular machine. If you are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.


Note: static IP - Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 15:22, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Ok, let's try to sort this out

  1. Talk:UserLonelyPker is a nonsense page which I have just deleted for the third time. Note that Talk:UserLonelyPker is not the same thing as User Talk:LonelyPker.
  2. Are you User:LonelyPker? If you are, then just login and use that account. If you aren't, then don't edit that page without permission.
  3. Special:Contributions/58.152.138.14 lists the edits, including Saddam-related vandalism of Guilt and Guilty, along with demands that Saddam Hussein be unprotected. Requesting unprotection is valid; doing it because you want to vandalize an article is disruption. As this appeared to be a static IP address, I'm assuming you're admitting that the vandalism was from you.
Here's the thing: Nonsense edits and vandalism can be removed. Legitimate warnings posted on talk pages should not be removed. Don't vandalize, and don't create nonsense pages like Talk:UserLonelyPker, and you won't have to worry about getting any more vandalism warnings. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 15:29, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


blah blah blah blah blah.......


PS. Please don't remove valid deletion requests from talk pages. Only nonsensical warnings should be removed. Cheers.

Well, glad to see you're in helpful mood to contribute. Perhaps we should semi-protect that user page so this manperson cannot edit it. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 15:36, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

and here we have a typical wiki user insisting on calling me a man. You may not know this but there a re 2 sexes of the human race. Keep up the good work. You funking sexist pig.

Please stop adding that template to this page. I've explained to you above why I added that template to Talk:UserLonelyPker. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 15:42, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

BUT i thought that template was valid because this is a talk page for an article that does not exist!!!!!!! Jesus fooking Christ just pick one rule and stick with it! Doesn't matter if you made it up!!

[edit] Ok, once more

User talk:LonelyPker is where you talk to User:LonelyPker.

Talk:UserLonelyPker is a nonsense page because there is no LonelyPker Wikipedia article.

And I'm just about ready to request that you be temporarily blocked for disruption of Wikipedia, so please stop, think a minute, and reconsider your actions. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 15:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


I'm sorry - since when was pointing out the obvious the same as personal attacks? So you do not agree that the assumption/generalisation that I was male was derogatory towards a female?? Have you even heard of sexual equality? It might seem pedantic to you but thats where it starts. If you ask for my opinion you also sound like a closet sexist. But that is just a guess and I may not be true. Please don't sue me. thanks.

I apologize if I used the wrong sex term. It was not intentional, and a bad assumption. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 15:54, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Please also remove your incorrect warning/comment about personal attacks. I assume that is a VALID one to remove since it is MISLEADING and LIBELOUS.

"You funking sexist pig" - I think not. I was only apologizing to defuse the situation; most editors on this site are males. I retract my apology. And if you do it again, I'll report you for personal attacks and/or vandalism -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 16:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


"most editors on this site are males." I guess that makes it alright then. And do you have a reference for that statement?

and I suppose by your reasoning if most editors on this site are white it is ok to asssume that everyone is white. keep up the good work.

ps. keep your apology if it makes you feel better - i never accepted it anyway. I don't like nazis.

[edit] You are disrupting Wikipedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 16:30, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and other deliberate attempts to disrupt Wikipedia are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Nishkid64 16:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Please stop trolling or you will soon lose the privilege of editing your talk page. Accurizer 16:45, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] thanks

for all your asisstance on contributing to my study titled "Why Wikipedia is it's own worst enemy"

I will try and behave from now on.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.79.213.234 (talk • contribs) .

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/1/9/User_talk%7E219.78.221.58.html"