User talk:217.251.173.136

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] ISP Info

inetnum:      217.246.0.0 - 217.255.255.255
netname:      DTAG-DIAL17
descr:        Deutsche Telekom AG
country:      DE
admin-c:      DTIP
tech-c:       DTST
status:       ASSIGNED PA
remarks:      ******************************************************************
remarks:      * Abuse Contact: http://www.t-com.de/ip-abuse in case of Spam,   *
remarks:      * Hack Attacks, Illegal Activity, Violation, Scans, Probes, etc. *
remarks:      ******************************************************************
mnt-by:       DTAG-NIC
source:       RIPE # Filtered

person:       DTAG Global IP-Addressing
address:      Deutsche Telekom AG
address:      D-90492 Nuernberg
address:      Germany
phone:        +49 180 5334332
fax-no:       +49 180 5334252
e-mail:       ripe.dtip@telekom.de
nic-hdl:      DTIP
mnt-by:       DTAG-NIC
source:       RIPE # Filtered

person:       Security Team
address:      Deutsche Telekom AG
address:      Germany
phone:        +49 180 5334332
fax-no:       +49 180 5334252
e-mail:       abuse@t-ipnet.de
nic-hdl:      DTST
mnt-by:       DTAG-NIC
source:       RIPE # Filtered

% Information related to '217.224.0.0/11AS3320'

route:        217.224.0.0/11
descr:        Deutsche Telekom AG, Internet service provider
origin:       AS3320
member-of:    AS3320:RS-PA-TELEKOM
mnt-by:       DTAG-RR
source:       RIPE # Filtered

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Netscott (talkcontribs) .

[edit] DRV

Done. Kotepho 12:18, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. 217.251.173.136 12:24, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Just come back

Why not just sign in? Although it doesn't appear as though you ever 'officially' left, your userpage does give one the impression that you're gone which obvioulsy is not the case. (Netscott) 16:13, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

There are still some open XFDs the user in question might be watching, but as you've seen at ANI archive 119 they'll soon disappear. With admins routinely ignoring the block / bot / deletion / etc. policies there's no point in "coming back". I think that this user disagrees fundamentally with their regime, she or he also disagrees with breaking backwards compatibility for no compelling reasons, or with treating users as "rabble" by admins using their prerogatives (what they do as editors is a different matter, and the user is on record supporting WP:SNOW and similar concepts). 89.51.16.125 18:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)