User talk:216.230.150.7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
This IP has been repeatedly blocked from editing Wikipedia in response to abuse of editing privileges. Further abuse from this IP may result in an immediate block without further warning.
Notify an administrator • contribs • block • block log

I have no idea what you are talking about. If you'd like to give me some context, feel free to do so. --Spangineeres (háblame) 19:22, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Never mind, I see now where you got my name. You need to remember that Wikipedia is a secondary source; that is, there should be no original research nor biased perspectives. That means that everything that is written should have been written in a book or peer-reviewed journal or the like before being posted here. Wikipedia isn't a place for writing personal opinions. --Spangineeres (háblame) 19:35, 9 November 2005 (UTC)

Hi. You are correct in that I know absolutely nothing about James Dale Davidson and his views. However, Wikipedia has a policy of writing from a neutral point of view, even when writing about controversial or emotional subjects. Please follow the link to read more about it. I'd be happy to see your additions rewritten in a neutral manner, if that's possible. Thanks! –Mysid (talk) 08:11, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

That would be nice! You might put those links and their descriptions to the Davidson article, maybe after the sentences they are related to. I can then arrange them under a specific References heading with "footnotes", conforming to the Wikipedia style guidelines, from the article text. Reading the neutral point of view policy might help you a lot. Also you could avoid writing in first person voice, or making any claims which are based on your original, unreferenced research or personal opinions. An editorial style of writing is definitely quite inappropriate for encyclopedia articles, where only facts that can be accepted by practically everyone can be stated. I must say I don't have the energy right now to make myself familiar with the Davidson case, so I can't assist you with the actual rewriting. –Mysid (talk) 10:21, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] January 2006

This message is regarding the page Naked short selling. Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Ichiro 01:43, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] February 2006

  1. Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Shanel 22:56, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] May 2006

Thank you for experimenting with the page Britney Spears on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. —PaperTruths(Talk) 02:40, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to The Walt Disney Company, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- SonicAD (talk) 03:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page The Walt Disney Company on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CobaltBlueTony 03:01, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

It might not have been your intent, but you recently removed content from Broccoli. Please be careful not to remove content from Wikipedia without a valid reason, which you should specify in the edit summary or on the article's talk page. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CobaltBlueTony 03:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Skittles (candy), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:14, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Skittles (candy), you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --AbsolutDan (talk) 03:16, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Nintendo on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you for your understanding. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. CobaltBlueTony 03:19, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked for vandalism for 24 hours. To contest this block, add the text {{unblock}} on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Please do not erase warnings on this page. Doing so is also considered vandalism.

RN 03:20, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits made during July 12, 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:35, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Tylenol

Your recent edit to Tylenol (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 05:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. (ESkog)(Talk) 05:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] 3 October, 2006

Regarding your edits on Market Reform Movement: Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Hu 21:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Regarding edits made during October 15, 2006 (UTC) to King Arthur

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Patstuart 05:52, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] November 9th 2006

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Mikhail Gorbachev, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Farquaadhnchmn(Dungeon) 23:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/1/6/User_talk%7E216.230.150.7.html"