User talk:210.210.145.9

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

  1. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. --lightdarkness 03:53, 7 February 2006 (UTC)


Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Green Day, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pegasus1138Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 08:15, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Linkspam

Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. *drew 11:32, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding commercial links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. *drew 16:36, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Creating an account

I strongly suggest you create an account. There are many reasons including the fact that your work will be taken more seriously, and other editors cannot see your (office?) address in Jakarta as we currently can. Kind regards --Merbabu 03:48, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Prabowo

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia, as you did to Prabowo. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

While I agree with you that this article is very poor quality, your blanking and highly POV comments are not the way to fix it. If you want to improve it, do so in accordance with wikipedia standards which inludes a HIGH level of referencing of each point you may add (and justify on the talk page anything you remove). happy editing, regards --Merbabu 22:31, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

UPDATE: I just had another look at your edit - it was really poor form. IN the past I have complained about your lack of sources, but this is different - it is almost vandalism. As i said, i agree the article is poor, but your highly POV comments have no place here. --Merbabu 22:44, 31 October 2006 (UTC)