User talk:207.69.137.207

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Attention:

This IP address, 207.69.137.207, is registered to EarthLink, an Internet service provider through which thousands of individual users may connect to the internet. This IP may be randomly assigned to a different person when the current user disconnects. Warnings or messages left on this page may not be received by the intended user. Caution should be used when blocking this IP or reverting its contributions without checking.

If you are an unregistered user operating from this address and are frustrated by irrelevant comments appearing here, you can avoid them by creating an account for yourself.

Contents

[edit] March 2005

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.

--ElTyrant 01:55, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

[edit] December 2005

This message is regarding the page Star Trek: Insurrection. Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. -- Kbh3rdtalk 01:03, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to Stephanie Bellars. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tuspm [Leave Me A Message] 00:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Rob Liefeld. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Aeon Insane Ward 06:28, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. MER-C 11:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] July 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to That's So Suite Life of Hannah Montana. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. tmopkisn tlka 23:18, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] September 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to January. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. -- Jim Douglas 20:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Please do not remove AfD notices from articles. If you would like to comment, please do so on the AfD page. Crystallina 04:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] HEY WHY?

Why did you put this on my file? Blocked wiki

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Mion 16:01, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Adrienne Bailon

Your recent edit to Adrienne Bailon (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 20:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Chicago

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Chicago, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --JForget 00:26, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Evolution, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 18:21, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] wake up ya brain

  Besides the controversy-which is better cats or dogs? the next biggest question is what’s real – the Bible? Or evolution?

  There’s so many different things against each but in the end nothing actually supports evolution with correct data.

 The fossil record is clearly strong evidence against evolution.
 Since none of us were around long ago to know how we really got here. Then where do we look to see what was? The fossil record. And the fossil record says evolution never happened.

If evolution is real then the fossil record should be littered with intermediate links,(the half man half ape kind of thing) as Charles Darwin predicted. Instead evolutionists present only a few highly questionable bones.

  But once a scientist did find a skeleton of a half-man half-ape. Later on, though, he admitted he found the ape bones miles away from human bones. He lied to try to prove his belief. 
In the scientific field you have to have a belief or you’ll be stuck. I don’t think anyone has scientific evidence that proves God is real-but neither does any evolutionist have real evidence that supports their unconfirmed theory. If something is true you shouldn’t have to make-up lies to try to prove it.

Even evolutionists admit that they’ve let lies go into textbooks and the media, they say they even have evidence that goes against evolution, most of the time they don’t give all the information and data needed-just the very small amount of data that only sort of goes with their ideas. But still they stand for what they believe in. The assumption has become so void of factual evidence that its supporter must cook up wild scenarios to explain away the lack of data in support of it.

  With all those fossils and bones evolutionists think they can figure out what really was-with not even half of what was there.
 Scientists found a single tooth among the remains of some ancient tools. Based on that single tooth they claimed they found a link between man and ape. They had artists draw full pictures of a hulking-brutish man, based on a single tooth. Later on, they discovered the tooth was from a certain type of pig.

Consequently, you should never believe the pictures you see-find out what fossils exist for the ‘creature’-you’ll be amazed by how little there is.

  With all the things they come up with they always seem to fail and go against the theory. Evolutionists have their own reasons why they believe what they do-a lot of the time it’s because that’s what they were taught all of their lives-and with no alternatives in school it takes out the real learning, since you should have freedom of alternatives to be able to understand more and decide what you viewpoint on how things work is-not others’.

Even though many people live by it evolution is still an unexplainable, unconfirmed, scientific theory. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.69.137.207 (talk) 18:30, 8 December 2006 (UTC).

[edit] Regarding your edit to Extreme Championship Wrestling:

Your recent edit to Extreme Championship Wrestling (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism or link spam to the page. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 10:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Extreme Championship Wrestling on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Lcarsdata 10:30, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 10:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Philadelphia Flyers

Sorry about that, didn't check to see if there was other edits. I was careless. Feel free to reinstate edits (accept Forsberg IR). GoodDay 23:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/0/7/User_talk%7E207.69.137.207.html"