User talk:207.255.174.254

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).

==Please stop vandalizing the pizza article. If you can come up with one reliable source for your insertion, by all means provide it. Sticking a phrase about pizza being of jewish origins on the front end of a sentence that starts the paragraph about its Greek origins shows a lack of ability to see beyond your viewpoint.


I am absolutely not trying to insult you. You absolutely either a) are pretending to be incapable of intelligent reason in order to be an attention-seeking troll or b) need psychiatric attention for your obsessive behavior. Wikipedia is built on a foundation of consensus and you try to impose your very individual and unique viewpoint that everything is Jewish on all of the articles you edit.


I'm not going to discuss this with you anymore as it is obviously a waste of time. If you continue vandalizing articles then I absolutely will report you and try to have you blocked. THB 20:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC) THB 20:50, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


If you're referring to the test of biased Zionist information being planted in articles which regard comforting things such as the term "happiness" then yes, and I'm sure you already know that I am the one who wrote it as well as removed it. If nothing else I certainly would hope my point at LEAST stands. I wrote as an example of the word Happiness; "The Jewish man was filled with happiness when he arrived in his homeland of Israel". The sentence remained for approximately 19 hours without any ommitance or revision. If this does not count as biased information then how is that "theft" and "dismay" are, despite that 97 percent of the civilized world knows that Arab people invented a lot of these dishes.

-Croatan

Sorry, I don't think I can help you as psych is not my area of expertise. If you're not just being silly to try to get attention, and you are not already under psychiatric care, then you should talk to a guidance counselor or the school nurse or your physician.THB 19:58, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Ah, the first proof of ignorance. When one cannot outdo his opponents point in a debate he resorts to childish insults. Sorry, I'm not offended. My point still stands. You have no idea wether or not i am "mentally ill" or anything about me except my I.P. adress which can be exchanged frequently, so what exactly are you trying to prove?

-Croatan

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. ( Pizza ) THB 13:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

By the way, I looked at your vandalism on the Nigger article as well. I haven't heard anyone Jewish use the word "nigger", they say "schwartzer" instead. When I've heard it, it sounded much worse than "nigger". THB

You know, it's good to be proud of who you are but if you continue to vandalize articles with your irrelevant, opinionated, and/or nonsensical comments I will request that you be blocked. You have a long history of it. You appear to have the ability to make real contributions to Wikipedia and the world at large but you need to learn to get along with other people and stop stuffing your adolescent obsessions down others' throats.THB 18:48, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I hope you're not offended, but I think you should read NPOV. Some of your edits show point of view, for example:

  • Hummus and Falafel - "theft" and "dismay" are biased; moreover, that does not seem to be the actual political climate. Discussion on Talk:Falafel.
  • Bill O'Reilly - "valid points" is POV; it is enough to say that he frequently interrupts guests. You'll note that your edit was removed.
  • Ra'annana - "Many innocent Arabs were murdered to have this town exist." I hope you can see on your own why this is POV. It's not even in context in the paragraph.

Of course it's not. Noone wants to know the ugly truth about how the beautiful, civilized, peace-loving nation of Israel was really founded. IfI put something you'd probably delete it.


If you want to discuss this, I've set a watch on your talk page. --Mgreenbe 12:11, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

This is the person whose edits you have deleted. You claim that I appear biased in my edits. It seems amusing to me that you don't feel the same way about yourself, being a Jew. I'm not predjudiced agaisnt you or your people, but I am also not afraid to tell the truth. Many stores claim many Arabic foods as "Israeli". Imagine if someone marketed Haunukah as a Christian holiday. Don't tell me it wouldn't bother you. Calling Hummus and Falafel Israeli cusine is biased to begin with.

It would help if you read Wikipedia:Talk page -- everyone on Wikipedia follows certain protocols (signatures, indentation, no double posting) to make the management of discussion easier. I've responded to your post on Talk:Falafel. Are you seriously comparing falafel to religion? --Mgreenbe 11:31, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

Im not comparing falafel to religion. Its a figure of speech homie.

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been removed or reverted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Jkelly 04:44, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Please refrain from removing content from Wikipedia, as you did to Zionism. It is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 05:25, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Ill remember that Actually, a lot of things I write in purely unbiased ways, are removed completely by whomsoever chooses to remove them

The Zionism article spans far more information than necessary about Jews, and all of that is best fit to go to the Jewish article. I understand that, Zionism as a simple concept should be explained in a simple fashion, and preferably not only by a Zionist. At least lets BOTH say something about it

You seem to forget how heavy the opposition is to Zionism, and therefore your version of the article is heavily biased

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../2/0/7/User_talk%7E207.255.174.254.html"