User talk:204.69.40.7
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Welcome!
Hello, 204.69.40.7, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Talk:Supermajority
The article should be there now and you can add to it. Because you don't yet have an account you can't make new pages so I made a blank one. I looked at the edits and I really didn't add anything to the article just reverted some vandalism. I thinkyour best bet is to go to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics. Good luck. Hope you get an account. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:09, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Stop vandalising Brookline, Massachusetts
Regarding Brookline, Massachusetts. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. . Andrew73 14:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Sword
Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sango123 (talk) 19:22, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification and removal of vandalism. I was a bit hasty on the revert, and I apologize. Regards, Sango123 (talk) 19:49, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
-
- By the way, regarding this edit summary, I invite you to take a look at Wikipedia:No personal attacks and Wikipedia:Civility. Thank you. Sango123 (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
- Is it really a personal attack for me to suggest you must prefer untruth to truth when you insist on reverting something from a factual account to one filled with falsehood? Rather than taking it as a personal attack (which it was not, it was rather a deduction based on your apparent love of counterfactual statements) take it as an opportunity to grow. Thanks! 204.69.40.7 19:56, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- You have either overlooked Wikipedia:Civility or are unwilling to comply with that policy. I'd greatly appreciate it if you reduced the hostility. Thank you. Sango123 (talk) 20:47, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Let it go, Sango. Your outrage isn't helping either of us get over the trauma of today. Let us move forward from this with an attitude of growth and learning. Perhaps soon we can forgive one another our mutual transgressions and become friends. It shall be ever so delightful! 204.69.40.7 20:55, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 02:11, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fact
I'm leaving it because it's hilarious: Best use of that template ever. But I am going to steal the idea. --Chris Griswold 20:04, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Defamation
Regarding your edit at Talk:Magik (comics), note Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons states:
Editors should remove any unsourced or poorly sourced negative material from biographies of living persons and their talk pages, and may do so without discussion; this is also listed as an exception to the three-revert rule. This principle also applies to biographical material about living persons found anywhere in Wikipedia. Administrators may enforce the removal of unsourced material with page protection and blocks, even if they have been editing the article themselves. Editors who re-insert the material may be warned and blocked. See the blocking policy and Wikipedia:Libel.
Please do not discuss issues of a derogatory nature again without referencing your material in reliable sources. Steve block Talk 22:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Your edit to The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster
Your recent edit to The Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] July 20, 2006
Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:31, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
- It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Attacking another user back can only satisfy trolls or anger contributors and leads to general bad feeling. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!
- Please stop, or you will be blocked.
- Alphachimp talk 18:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Omicronpersei8. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. If you feel that the edit I reverted should not have been reverted, please contact me. -- Omicronpersei8 (talk) 18:55, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Erasing content
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 19:29, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Provocative language
"Original research and so friggin' masturbatory that I actually need to go wash my hands. Jesus. Somebody clearly enjoyed themselves a lot while putting that little list of rationalizations and nonsense together."
Wikipedia is not the place for this kind of debate. It's inflamatory, incites flames, and insults contributers. Voice opinions on improving the articles, but don't troll. Lengis 03:08, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [IP info · Traceroute · WHOIS · Abuse · City · RDNS] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |